تعیین روایی و پایایی نسخه فارسی پرسش‌نامة رفتار کنترلی مربی (CCBS)

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، تهران ، ایران

3 دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی، تهران ، ایران.

4 دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

 هدف: هدف از پژوهش حاضرتعیین روایی و پایایی پرسش‌نامه رفتار کنترلی مربی در جامعه ایران بود.روش‎‌ها: روش پژوهش زمینه‌یابی و نمونه پژوهش284 ورزشکار رشته های مختلف ورزشی بودند که به شیوه در دسترس انتخاب شدند و پرسش‌نامه را که به روش ترجمه-بازترجمه  توسط متخصصان روان شناسی ورزشی آماده شده بود تکمیل کردند. جهت تعیین ویژگی های روان سنجی ابزار از نرم افزارهای  SPSS  و  Amos نسخه 24 استفاده شد.نتایج: نتایج تحلیل عاملی نشان داد ساختار چهار عامل، از جهت تفکیک سؤالها و انطباق بـا مبـانی مناسب است. همچنین نتایج تحلیل عاملی تأییدی نشان داد الگوی چهار عاملی سازة رفتار کنترلی مربی شامل پاداش، تهدید، کنترل شخصی بیش از اندازه و ملاحظات مشروط منفی دارای برازندگی مناسبی است. (96/0= CFI، 91/0 =NFI، 94/0 = RMSEA،  053/0= IFI،  96/0 = ,NNFI 072/1=CMIN/DF). ضریب همسانی درونی (آلفای کرونباخ) برای کل پرسشنامه 918/0 و برای مولفه ها بین731/0 تا  897/0 بدست آمد و در مجموع از پایایی قابل قبولی برخوردار است.نتیجه‌گیری: نسخه فارسی پرسش‌نامه رفتار کنترلی مربی می تواند به عنوان ابزاری پایا و روا برای مطالعه و ارزیابی رفتار کنترلی مربیان در حوزه ورزش به کار برده شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Validity and reliability of the Persian version of Controlling Coach Behaviors Scale (CCBS)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Behnaz Arbab 1
  • Mohammad VaezMousavi 2
  • Sadegh Nasri 3
  • Esmail Nasiri 4
1 Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch
2 Emam Hossein University
3 Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University
4 Shahed University
چکیده [English]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine validity and reliability of the Persian version of controlling coach behaviors scale (CCBS) respectively in Iranian society.
Methods:136 athletes with different skill levels in sport completed a questionnaire, that was prepared by sports psychologists expert a translation-back translation method.Confirmatory factor analysis based on structural equations was used for validation of structure of questionnaire, Cronbach alpha coefficient was used for validation of internal consistency of questionnaire.
Results: The results showed that Controlling Coach Behavior Scale (CCBS) had acceptable fit index (CFI= 0.932, GFI= 0.932, NFI= 0.906, RMSEA= 0.044) internal consistency (Controlling Use of Rewards= 0.789, Negative Conditional Regard= 0.774, Intimidation= 0.701, Excessive Personal Control= 0/682 and the total= 0.842) indicating good validity and reliability of the Persian version of controlling coach behavior questioner.
Conclusion: Therefore, the Persian version of the Controlling Coach Behavior questioner (CCBS) can be used as a valid and reliable tool to study and evaluate the controlling coachs behavior.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Internal Consistency- Construct validity- Controlling Use of Rewards
  • Intimidation- Negative Conditional Regard- Excessive Personal Control

مراجع

  1. Amorose, A. J., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2007). Autonomy-supportive coaching and self-determined motivation in high school & college athletes: A test of self determination theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(5), 654-670.
  2. Mageau, G. A, & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The coach–athlete relationship: A motivational model. Journal of sports science, 21(11), 883-904.
  3. Serpa, S. (1399). Relationship coach athlete: outstanding trends in European research Motricidade humana. Portugese journal of human performance Studies, 12 (1): 7-19.
  4. Kavussanu M, Boardley I. D, Jutkiewicz N, Vincent S, and Ring C, (2008). Coaching Efficacy and Coaching Effectiveness: examining their predictors and comparing coaches’ and athletes’ reports. The Sport Psychologist, pp: 383-404.
  5. Malete L, Sullivan P, (2009). Sources of coaching efficacy in coaches in Botswana, International Journal of Coaching Science. Vol 3, No 1, pp: 17-2.
  6. Dunn, J. G (2003). An investigation of multidimensional worry disposition in high contact sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise Journal, 4, 265-282.
  7. Gould, D., & Udry, E (1994). Psychological skills for enhancing performance: Arousal regulation skills. Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise, 26, 478-485.
  8. Nazarudin, M. N. B. H., Fauzee, M. S. O., Jamalis, M., Geok, S. K., & Din, A. (2009). Coaching Leadership Styles and Athlete Satisfactions among Malaysian University Basketball Team. Research Journal of International Studies, Issue 9.
  9. Hays, K., Maynard, I., Thomas, O., & Bawden, M. (2007). Sources and types of confidence identified by world class sport performers. Journal of applied sport psychology, ,19(4), 434–456. DOI:10.1080/10413200701599173.
  10. Gearity, B., Murray, MA. (2011). Athletes’ experiences of psychological effects of poor coaching. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,. 12, 213–221. DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.11.004.
  11. Horn T.S, (2008). Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain, In T.S. Horn (Ed). Advances in sport psychology, Champing, IL: Human kinetics, pp: 309-355.
  12. Duda, J., Balaguer, I., Jowett, S., & Lavallee, D. (2007). Coach-created motivational climate. Social psychology in sport, 117-13.
  13. Bartholomew, K., Ntoumanis, N., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2010). The controlling interpersonal style in a coaching context: Development and initial validation of a psychometric scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32, 193-121.
  14. Hollembeak, J & Amorose, A.J. (2005). Perceived Coaching Behaviors and College athletes In trinsic motivation: a test of self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17, 20-36.
  15. Kaisa K, & Vello H. (2015). Controlling Coaching Behavior, Psychoogical Need Thwarting, Motivaion and Results of the Volleyball Comptitions .Acta Kinesiologiae Universitatis Tartuensis. Vol. 21, pp.
  16. Kelly Barcza-Renner, & Robert C. Eklund, Alexandre J.S. Morin, and Christine. (2016). Controlling Coaching Behaviors and Athlet Burnout: Investigating the Mediating Roles of Perfectionismand Motivation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 38, 30 -44.
  17. Kenow, L.J., & Williams, J.M. (1992). Relationship between anxiety, self-confidence, and the evaluation of coaching behaviors. The Sport Psychologist, 6, 344-357.
  18. Kenow, L.J., & Williams, J.M. (1999). Coach-athlete compatibility and athlete’s perception and evaluative reactions to coaching behaviors. Journal of Sport Behavior. 22, 251-259.
  19. Martin S B, Barnes K. (1999). Coaching behavior questionnaire. Unpublished manual. University of North Texas. Denton.
  20. Chaladurai, P. & Salleh, S. (1980). Dimension of leader behavior in sports: Development of a leadership scale. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 34-45.
  21. Hu Lt, Bentler PM. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:
  22. A Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: multidisciplinary journal.; 6 (1):1-55.
  23. Logadottir, Rakel. (2013). The Translation of Controlling Coach Behavior Scale (CCBS) from English to Icelandic and Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of the Icelandic versi.Thesis of Master of Science in Exercise Science and Coachin.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 10 شهریور 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 22 بهمن 1399
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 11 دی 1399

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار