ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخة فارسی پرسشنامة تعهد به فعالیت بدنی در نوجوانان

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه رفتار حرکتی و روان شناسی ورزشی، دانشکدۀ علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه اراک، اراک، ایران

2 دبیر تربیت بدنی آموزش و پرورش اراک

3 کارشناسی ارشد رفتار حرکتی دانشگاه اراک

چکیده

هدف: فعالیت بدنی منظم برای جنبه­های جسمانی، روانی و اجتماعی مرتبط با سلامتی در نوجوانان مفید است. وجود ابزار روا و پایا برای سنجش تعهد به فعالیت بدنی در نوجوانان ضروری است. لذا هدف از این پژوهش تعیین روایی و پایایی نسخة فارسی پرسشنامة تعهد به فعالیت بدنی در نوجوانان بود.روش­شناسی: نمونة آماری دانش­آموزان دختر شهر اراک بودند که 146 نفر از آن‌ها با روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. شرکت‌کنندگان پرسشنامه مشخصات فردی و مقیاس تعهد به فعالیت بدنی نوجوانان رابینز و همکاران (2017) را تکمیل نمودند. تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها با تحلیل عاملی تأییدی و آلفای کرونباخ انجام شد.یافته­ها: نتایج نشان داد که شاخص نیکویی برازش و شاخص برازش تطبیقی بالاتر از (90/0) می­باشد و ضریب آلفای کرونباخ برای تعهد به فعالیت بدنی و ابعاد آن بالای 7/0 (مقدار شاخص قابل‌قبول بودن) به­دست آمد.نتیجه­گیری: به‌طورکلی نتایج نشان داد که نسخة فارسی مقیاس تعهد به فعالیت بدنی در نوجوانان ایرانی دارای روایی و پایایی قابل‌قبول می‌باشد. لذا از این پرسشنامه می‌توان جهت اهداف آموزشی و پژوهشی در نوجوانان استفاده کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric Characteristics of Persian Version of the Commitment to Physical Activity Scale for Adolescents

نویسندگان [English]

  • Jalil Moradi 1
  • Shamsi Jalali 2
  • Mina Ahmadi 3
1 Department of Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Arak University, Arak, Iran
2 Physical Education Teacher of Arak Education
3 M.Sc Student of Motor Behavior, Arak University, Arak, Iran
چکیده [English]

Purpose: Regular physical activity is beneficial for the physical, mental, and social aspects of adolescents' health. Valid and reliable tools are needed to measure adolescents' commitment to physical activity. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of Persian version of the Commitment to Physical Activity Scale for Adolescents.
Methods: The statistical sample consisted of female students of Arak city who were selected by available sampling method. Participants completed the demographic characteristics questionnaire and the Commitment to Physical Activity Scale for Adolescents (Robbins et al., 2016). Data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha.
Results: The results showed that the goodness of fit index and comparative fit index were higher than (0.90). Also, the results showed that Cronbach's alpha coefficient for Commitment to Physical Activity Scale and its dimensions was above 0.7 (the value of acceptable index).
Conclusion: In general, the results showed that the Persian version of the the Commitment to Physical Activity Scale in Iranian adolescents had acceptable validity and reliability. Therefore, this questionnaire can be used for educational and research purposes.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Commitment to Physical Activity Model
  • Validity
  • Reliability
  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis
1. Lee I-M, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair
SN, Katzmarzyk PT, et al. Effect of physical
inactivity on major non-communicable diseases
worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and
life expectancy. The lancet. 2012;380(9838):219-
29.
2. Sigvartsen J, Gabrielsen LE, Abildsnes E, Stea
TH, Omfjord CS, Rohde G. Exploring the relationship between physical activity, life goals
and health-related quality of life among high
school students: a cross-sectional study. BMC
public health. 2016;16(1):709.
3. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM.
Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness:
definitions and distinctions for health-related
research. Public health reports.
1985;100(2):126.
4. Tammelin R, Yang X, Leskinen E, Kankaanpaa
A, Hirvensalo M, Tammelin T, et al. Tracking of
physical activity from early childhood through
youth into adulthood. Med Sci Sports Exerc.
2014;46(5):955-62.
5. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R,
Haskell W, Ekelund U, et al. Global physical
activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and
prospects. The lancet. 2012;380(9838):247-57.
6. Haraldstad K, Christophersen KA, Eide H,
Nativg GK, Helseth S. Predictors of health‐related
quality of life in a sample of children and
adolescents: a school survey. Journal of Clinical
Nursing. 2011;20(21‐22):3048-56.
7. Michel G, Bisegger C, Fuhr DC, Abel T. Age and
gender differences in health-related quality of
life of children and adolescents in Europe: a
multilevel analysis. Quality of life research.
2009;18(9):1147.
8. Robbins LB, Ling J, Wesolek SM, Kazanis AS,
Bourne KA, Resnicow K. Reliability and validity of
the commitment to physical activity scale for
adolescents. American Journal of Health
Promotion. 2017;31(4):343-52.
9. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC,
Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the
United States measured by accelerometer.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
2008;40(1):181-8.
10. Jiménez-Pavón D, Kelly J, Reilly JJ.
Associations between objectively measured
habitual physical activity and adiposity in
children and adolescents: Systematic review.
International Journal of Pediatric Obesity.
2010;5(1):3-18.
11. Kelly CW. Commitment to health: a predictor
of dietary change. Journal of clinical nursing.
2011;20(19‐20):2830-6.
12. Scanlan TK, Chow GM, Sousa C, Scanlan LA,
Knifsend CA. The development of the sport
commitment questionnaire-2 (English version).
Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2016;22:233-
46.
13. Scanlan TK, Carpenter PJ, Simons JP, Schmidt
GW, Keeler B. An introduction to the sport
commitment model. Journal of sport and
exercise psychology. 1993;15(1):1-15.
14. Wilson PM, Rodgers WM, Carpenter PJ, Hall
C, Hardy J, Fraser SN. The relationship between
commitment and exercise behavior. Psychology
of Sport and Exercise. 2004;5(4):405-21.
15. Gabriele JM, Gill DL, Adams CE. The roles of
want to commitment and have to commitment
in explaining physical activity behavior. Journal
of Physical Activity and Health. 2011;8(3):420-8.
16. DeBate RD, Huberty J, Pettee K. Psychometric
properties of the commitment to physical
activity scale. American journal of health
behavior. 2009;33(4):425-34.
17. Welk GJ, Corbin CB, Dale D. Measurement
issues in the assessment of physical activity in
children. Research quarterly for exercise and
sport. 2000;71(sup2):59-73.
18. Pender N, Garcia, AW., Ronis, DL. Health
Promotion Model instruments to measure HPM
behavioral determinants: Planning for exercise
[commitment] (adolescent version). 1995:
Available at:
http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/
85347.19. Dishman RK, Hales DP, Sallis JF, Saunders R,
Dunn AL, Bedimo-Rung AL, et al. Validity of
social-cognitive measures for physical activity in
middle-school girls. Journal of pediatric
psychology. 2009;35(1):72-88.
20. Hallal PC, Victora CG, Azevedo MR, Wells JC.
Adolescent physical activity and health. Sports
medicine. 2006;36(12):1019-30.
21. Weiss M, Amorose, AJ. Motivational
orientations and sport behavior. In: Horn T,
editor. Advances in Sport Psychology 3
Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2008. p. 115-55.
22. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural
equation modeling: Guilford publications; 2015.
23. Carpenter PJ, Scanlan TK, Simons JP, Lobel M.
A test of the sport commitment model using
structural equation modeling. Journal of Sport
and exercise Psychology. 1993;15(2):119-33.
24. Raedeke TD. Is athlete burnout more than
just stress? A sport commitment perspective.
Journal of sport and exercise psychology.
1997;19(4):396-417.
25. Taymoori P, Rhodes R, Berry T. Application of
a social cognitive model in explaining physical
activity in Iranian female adolescents. Health
Education Research. 2008;25(2):257-67.