مقایسه اثر بازخورد آگاهی از اجرای تأییدی، تصحیحی و ترکیبی بر انگیزش درونی و یادگیری سرویس پینگ‌پنگ

نوع مقاله : علمی - ترویجی

نویسندگان

اصفهان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اصفهان دانشکده تربیت بدنی کدپستی:81568

چکیده

هدف از تحقیق حاضرتعیین اثر بازخورد آگاهی از اجرای تأییدی، تصحیحی و ترکیبی با تناوب متفاوت بر انگیزش درونی و یادگیری سرویس پینگ­پنگ با پیچ پهلویی بود.بدین منظور، هشتاد دختر مبتدی با دامنة سنی 15-16 سال با آرایش تصادفی و به طور مساوی در چهار گروه بازخورد تأییدی، تصحیحی، تأییدی-تصحیحی و تصحیحی-تأییدی قرار گرفتند. مرحلة اکتساب، شامل اجرای 120 سرویس پینگ پنگ در قالب 24 دسته کوشش پنج تایی بود. هر چهار گروه بعد از هر دسته کوشش پنج تایی بازخورد خلاصة آگاهی از اجرا دریافت کردند. گروه تأییدی، بازخورد خلاصه روی حرکاتی که درست انجام داده بودند، گروه تصحیحی، بازخورد خلاصة تصحیحی روی حرکاتی که اشتباه انجام داده بودند و گروه تأییدی-تصحیحی و تصحیحی-تأییدی هر دو نوع بازخورد را با تناوب متفاوت دو به یک (دو تأییدی یک تصحیحی و بالعکس) دریافت کردند.روز بعد از مرحلة اکتساب، آزمون انتقال و ده روز بعد آزمون یادداری انجام شد. قبل و بعد از مرحلة اکتساب، شرکت کنندگان پرسشنامة انگیزش درونی را پر کردند. روشهای آماری تحلیل واریانس با اندازه گیریهای مکرر برای مقایسة اجرا در مرحلة اکتساب، آنالیز واریانس یکراهه برای مقایسة آزمون یادداری و انتقال و کوواریانس برای مقایسة نمرات انگیزش درونی و زیرمؤلفه­های آناستفاده شد. گروه بازخورد تأییدی– تصحیحی در هر سه مرحلة اکتساب، یادداری و انتقال نمرات بالاتری نسبت به سه گروه دیگر به دست آورد. انگیزش درونی و زیرمقیاس­های آن در گروه تأییدی و تأییدی-تصحیحی از دو گروه دیگر بالاتر بود.

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Comparison of the Effects of the Confirmative, Corrective andcombinative Feedbacks on intrinsic motivation and learning Table Tennis Service

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of confirmative, corrective, and combinative feedbacks with different alternation on intrinsic motivation and on learning table tennis service with a lateral twist. To this end, 80 beginner girls between the ages of 15 and 16 were selected through a random sampling. Next, they were placed in four equal groups receiving different feedbacks including: confirmative, corrective, and combinative feedbacks. The desired acquisition level consisted of 120 table tennis services, performed in the form of 24 groups of 5 trials. All four groups received a summary of feedback knowledge of performance after each of five trials. The group with confirmative feedback received the feedback summary of their correct movements, and the group with corrective feedback received the feedback summary of their wrong movements.The groups with combinative feedbacks received both confirmative and corrective feedbacks (twice and one time) alternatively. The day after the acquisition, the transfer test was done. Ten days later the retention test was performed.Before and after the acquisition level, participants filled the questionnaire related to the intrinsic motivation. The analytic methods for analyzing variance, which were measured repeatedly, were used for the comparison of the performance in the acquisition level. The analysis of the one-way variance was used in order to compare the retention test. The transfer and covariance were used in order to compare the intrinsic motivation scores and the sub-variables. The results revealed that in comparison with the other three groups, the confirmative-corrective group achieved higher scores in all three levels of acquisition, transfer, and retention. Intrinsic motivation and its sub-scales were also higher in two groups with the confirmative-corrective and the confirmative feedbacks in comparison with the two other groups.

  1. - Schmidt, R.A., & Lee, T.D. (2005). Motor control and learning (4thed). Champaign. IL: Human Kinetics.
  2. - Strube , G & Strand, B. (2015). Can Feedback Affect Motivation? Oklahoma associahion for health, physical education, Strobe, vol 52, no 2. 50-55
  3. - Schmidt, R.A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: vidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G.E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials i motor neuroscience (pp. 59-75). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  4. - Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2007). Feedback after good trials enhances Learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,78, 40-47.
  5. - Salmoni, A., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological bulletin, 95, 355-386.
  6. - Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 408-415.
  7. - Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2005). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 42-48.
  8. - Badami, R., VaezMousavi, M., Wulf, G., & Namazizadeh, M. (2011). Feedback after goodversus poor trials affects intrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly for Exercise andSport, 82(2), 360-364.
  9. - Schmidt, R.A., & Lee, T. (2011). Motor control and learning (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetic.
  10. - Badami, R., VaezMousavi, M., Wulf, G., & Namazizadeh, M. (2012). Feedback about moreaccurate versus less accurate trials: differential effects on self-confidence andactivation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83(2), 196-203
  11. - بادامی، رخساره.(1388). اثر بازخورد افزوده به کوشش‌های موفق و ناموفق بر یادگیری ضربة پات‌گلف: میانجیگری انگیزش، رسالة دکتری، دانشگاه آزاد علوم و تحقیقات تهران.
  12. - 12-Badami, R .Kohestani, S & Taghian, F. (2011). Feedback on more accurate trials enhances learning of sport skills. Wrld applied sciences 13(3), 537-540
  13. - Badami, R., Kohestani, S. and Taghian, F. (2011b). "Feedback on moreaccurate trials enhances learning of sport skills". World applied sciences journal.133, PP: 537-540
  14. - Maxwell, J.P., Masters, R., Kerr, E. and Weedon, E. (2001). The implicit benefit of learning without errors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1049-1068.
  15. -Vallerand, R.J., Reid, G. (1984). On the casual effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 94-102.
  16. .
  17. -Koka, A., & Hein, V. (2003). Perceptions of teachers’ feedback and learning environment as predictors of intrinsic motivation in physical education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4, 333 -346.
  18. -Black, S. J., & Weiss, M. R. (1992). The relationships among perceived coaching behaviours, perceptions of ability, and motivation in competitive age-group swimmers. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14, 309 – 325
  19. -Horn, T. S. (2002). Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain. In T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology. (pp. 309 – 354). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  20. -Nicaise,V., Bois,J.E, Fairclough,S.J., Amorose,A.J., & Cogerino,G. (2007). Girls’ and boys’ perceptions of physical education teachers’ feedback: Effects on performance and psychological responses. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(8), 915 – 926
  21. - Nieuwenhuis, S., Slagter, H.A., Alting von Geusau, N.J., Heslenfeld, D.J., & Holroyd, C.B. (2005). Knowing good from bad: Differential activation of human cortical areas by positive and negative outcomes. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 3161-3168
  22. -Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Wally, R., & Borges, T. (2009). KR after good trials enhances learning in the elderly. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport