تأثیر تعدیل‌کنندگی تیپ شخصیتی افراد بر یادگیری مهارت‌های سرویس بلند و کوتاه بدمینتون به روش‌های مسدود و تصادفی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه رفتار حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

2 کارشناس ارشد رفتار حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

3 دانشجوی دکتری رفتار حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: پژوهش حاضر به منظور بررسی اثر تعدیل‌کنندگی تیپ شخصیتی افراد بر یادگیری مهارت‌های بدمینتون به روش‌های تصادفی و مسدود انجام گرفت.

روش: این مطالعه از نوع نیمه‌تجربی و با طرح پیش‌آزمون پس‌آزمون 4 گروهی است. جامعه آماری دانشجویان دانشگاه تبریز بودند که با استفاده از پرسشنامه فریدمن و روزنمن (1964)، 30 نفر دارای تیپ شخصیت آ و 30 نفر دارای تیپ شخصیتی ب انتخاب شده و هر تیپ شخصیتی به 2 گروه تمرینی مسدود و تصادفی تقسیم شدند. آزمون اکتساب به مدت 10 جلسه و هر جلسه 3 بسته 20 کوششی بود و آزمون یادداری و انتقال 48 ساعت بعد از اکتساب انجام شد. داده‌ها از روش تحلیل واریانس با اندازه‌گیری‌های مکرر تحلیل شدند.

یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که در اکتساب روش مسدود بر تصادفی برتری معنا‌داری دارد و تیپ شخصیتی فراگیران نقشی در آن ایفا نمی‌کند، در یادداری تفاوت معناداری بین 4 گروه مشاهده نشد و فقط در سرویس کوتاه فراگیران با تیپ شخصیتی آ که به روش تصادفی تمرین کرده بودند بر سایر گروه‌ها برتری داشتند (021/0p=) و در مرحله انتقال نیز تمرین تصادفی در هر دو گروه تیپ شخصیتی آ و ب از نظر آماری بر سایرین برتری داشتند (0001/0p=).

نتیجه‌گیری: به نظر می‌رسد تیپ شخصیتی در تمرین تصادفی و مسدود نقش تعدیل‌کنندگی معنا‌داری ندارد و همچنان تمرین مسدود در اکتساب و تمرین تصادفی در انتقال از اولویت برخوردار می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Moderating Individuals' Personality Type on the Learning of Long and Short Badminton Serve Techniques in Blocked and Random Methods

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Taghi Aghdasi 1
  • Fatemeh Aghdam 2
  • Zohreh Khalilpour 3
1 Professor of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
2 MS Student of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
3 Ph.D Student of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Purpose: The present study was conducted to investigate the moderating effect of personality type on badminton skill learning in the random and blocked methods.
Methods: This study was a quasi-experimental study with a four-group post-test-pre-test design. The statistical population was the students of Tabriz University who used Friedman and Rosenman questionnaires to select individuals with personality types A and B, and each personality type was divided into two groups with blocked and random training. The acquisition test was conducted in ten sessions, and in each session three packages of twenty trials were administered, as well as a retention and transfer test 48 hours after acquisition. Data were analysed by repeated measures analysis of variance.
Results: The blocked method had a significant advantage over the random method in the acquisition of the learning material and the personality type of the learners did not play a role. There was no significant difference in retention performance between the 4 groups (P=0/021). In the transfer phase, random training was statistically superior to the other groups in both the personality type A group and the personality type B group (P=0/0001).
Conclusion: It appears that personality type does not play a significant moderating role in random training and blocked training, and that blocked training in the acquisition phase and random training in the transfer phase also take precedence.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Contextual interference
  • personality
  • learning
  • badminton

مراجع

  1. Shafizadeh A, Shaban A. The effect of contextual interference on the acquisition, retention and transfer of basic gymnastics skills in children. Motor behavior, 2018, 21; 10(31):161–76. In Persian

 https://doi.org/10.22089/mbj.2017.3229.1395

  1. Arab-Ameri E, Hemayattalab R, Karimiyani N, Sami S. Effect of Blocked, Random, and systematically Increasing Practice Schedules on Learning of Various Basketball Pass. jrsm. 2012, 1(2):87–99. In Persian
  2. Sabbaghi A, Behpoor N, Hirani A. The effect of contextual interference and the type of feedback (self-controlled and paired) on different stages of parameter component learning in children. Journal of Motor Development and Learning. 2014, 6(1):37–56. In Persian
  3. Travlos AK. Specificity and Variability of Practice, and Contextual Interference in Acquisition and Transfer of an Underhand Volleyball Serve. Percept Mot Skills. 2010, 110(1):298–312.

https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.110.1.298-312

  1. Hatami F, Namazizadeh M., Aslankhani M. The effect of contextual interference on the acquisition, retention and transfer of volleyball skills with different and identical generalized movement programs. Research in sports science. 2010; (24):123–48. (n Persian
  2. Wulf G, Shea C, Lewthwaite R. Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Medical Education, 2010, 44, 75-84.

10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x

  1. Shmidt RA, Lee TD, Winstein C, Wulf G, Zelaznik HN. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Hum Kinet. 2018.
  2. Magill RA, Anderson D. Motor learning and control: concepts and applications. 12th edition, McGraw-Hill, 2021.
  3. Magill RA, Hall KG. A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Hum Mov Sci. 1990;9(3–5):241–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(90)90005-X
  4. Schmidt RA. Motor schema theory after 27 years: Reflections and implications for a new theory. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2003;74(4). 10.1080/02701367.2003.10609106
  5. Abdul Maleki H, Farokhi A, Ghorbani A, Khajavi A. Meta-analysis of the effect of contextual interference on learning separate and continuous motor tasks with the same and different generalized movement programs. Exercise Psychology. 2011; 3 (2): 1-8. In Persian
  6. Abdul Shahi M., Farrokhi A., Kazem Nejad A. The effect of contextual interference on learning the same and different badminton skills. J Olympic. 2007; 14(1):7-18. In Persian

13.Nazarzadeh f, mami sh, nazarzadeh m. Examine the relationship between personality type and level of confidence in the girl students in Zainab hostel of Lorestan University. University-of-Medical-Sciences. 2014 Jul 1;22(3):149–54. In Persian

  1. Rezaei Kalantari M, Arabzadeh Toosi Z. The Relationship between Student’s Personality Type and Their Creativity. J Health and Care. 2018, 10;20(2):148–55. In Persian 10.29252/jhc.20.2.148
  2. Akbari M, Kashani H, Nikokar H, Zahed Far K. Investigating the role and effects of personality types on organizational citizenship behavior mediated by perceived stress. Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 9 (39): 57–72. In Persian
  3. Barto VA. The relationship between personality traits of selected New Jersey public high school educators and successful academic achievement of at-risk students 4006. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences. 1998.
  4. Farnoodi F, Amiri H, Jalali R. Evaluation of the relationship between personality type A and B with type 2 diabetes in patients referred to Kermanshah Diabetes Center in 2014. Clinical research in paramedical sciences. 2015; Fourth Year (3): 188–97. In Persian
  5. Rezakhani S. Ways different copes of personality types cope with stress. Psychological studies. 2012; 8 (2): 123–41. In Persian
  6. Alnasir FA, Alfulaij AR. Type A and B personalities from a psychological perspective among medical students. Int J Psychophysiol. 2014; 94(2):208. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.08.841
  7. Aydın İ, Pehlivan Z. Strategies and personality types used by primary school principals in Turkey to influence teachers (Ankara case). Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2010;2(2):3652–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.568
  8. Bornstein RF. The dependent personality: Developmental, social, and clinical perspectives. Vol. 112, Psychological Bulletin. US: American Psychological Association; 1992. 3–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.3
  9. Fernández-Concepción O, Verdecie-Feria O, Chávez-Rodríguez L, Alvarez-González MA, Fiallo-Sánchez MC. [Type A behaviour and life events as risk factors for cerebral infarct]. Rev Neurol. 2002;34(7):622–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.33588/rn.3407.2001402
  10. Abdoshahi M, Koroei M. Comparison of A and B personality types based on the motivation of participating in sports activities in adult girls. frooyesh. 2019, 1;8(3):81–90. In Persian
  11. Khosravi Sh, Hagayeg Sa. Comparison of personality traits and types between athletes in collision and non-collision sports. Knowledge and research in applied psychology. 2018; 18 (4): 21–34. In Persian
  12. Nia ME, Besharat MA. Comparison of athletes’ personality characteristics in individual and team sports. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2010;5:808–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.189
  13. Khormaii F, Khayyer M. Investigating the causal model of personality traits, motivational orientations and cognitive learning strategies. Social Sciences and Humanities, Shiraz University. 2006; 25 (4 79–97. In Persian
  14. Le K, Donnellan MB, Conger R. Personality Development at Work: Workplace Conditions, Personality Changes, and the Corresponsive Principle. J Pers. 2014 Feb 1;82(1):44–56.
  15. Shakerinia I, Mohammadpoor M. Relationship Between Psychological Characteristics Mental Health, Aggression and Driving Habits in Dangerous Drivers. SSU_Journals. 2010, 18(3):225–33.
  16. Kordi M, Motashreai E, Zakizadeh B. Badminton Applied Physiology. Tehran University Press, 2011. P.105. In Persian
  17. Nazari S, Hemayat talab R, Sheikh M, Homayoun Nia M. The effect of increasingly systematic contextual interference on learning a different generalized motor program (volleyball service). Journal of Motor Development and Learning. 2015; 7 (4): 491–510. In Persian
  18. Rasekhi M, Yousefi B, Agdasi M. The effect of random and blocked training on the performance and retention of football pass skills. Journal of Motor Development and Learning. 2009; 1 (1): 79–92. In Persian
  19. Fazel J. Comparison of five major personality factors between male and female athletes and non-athletes. Journal of Motor Development and Learning. 2011; 3 (2): 81–98. In Persian
  20. Pollock BJ, Lee TD. Dissociated Contextual Interference Effects in Children and Adults. Percept Mot Skills. 1997, 84(3):851–8. 10.2466/pms.1997.84.3.851
  21. Hebert EP, Landin D, Solmon MA. Practice Schedule Effects on the Performance and Learning of Low- and High-Skilled Students: An Applied Study. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996, 67(1):52–8. 10.1080/02701367.1996.10607925
  22. French KE, Rink JE, Werner PH. Effects of Contextual Interference on Retention of Three Volleyball Skills. Percept Mot Skills. 1990, 71(1):179–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1990.71.1.179
  23. Bortoli L, Robazza C, Durigon V, Carra C. Effects of Contextual Interference on Learning Technical Sports Skills. Percept Mot Skills. 1992, 75(2):555–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1992.75.2.555
  24. Brady F. Contextual Interference and Teaching Golf Skills. Percept Mot Skills. 1997;84(1):347–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1997.84.1.347
  25. Ávila F, Damas J, García JA, Luis V, Reina R, Ruíz A. Contextual Interference in Learning Precision Skills. Percept Mot Skills. 2003, 97(1):121–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.97.1.121
  26. Goode S, Magill RA. Contextual Interference Effects in Learning Three Badminton Serves. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1986;57(4):308–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1986.10608091
  27. Wegman E. Contextual Interference Effects on the Acquisition and Retention of Fundamental Motor Skills. Percept Mot Skills. 1999; 88(1):182–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1999.88.1.182
  28. Davoodi A, Safikhani A, Mehrabizadeh Honarmand M. Investigation of Brain-Behavioral Systems as Predictors of Personality Types A, C and D. Journal of Psychological Achievements. 2009; 16(2):87–112. In Persian
  29. Ste-Marie DM, Clark SE, Findlay LC, Latimer AE. High Levels of Contextual Interference Enhance Handwriting Skill Acquisition. J Mot Behav. 2004;36(1):115–26. 10.3200/JMBR.36.1.115-126
  30. Fazel Kalkhoran J, Hemayattalab R, Arab Ameri A, Hominian D. The effect of implicit interference on the acquisition, retention and transfer of three volleyball skills. J Move. 2009;38(1):38-221. In Persian
  31. Shea JB, Zimny ST. Context effects in memory and learning movement information. In: Advances in Psychology. Elsevier; 1983, 345–66.
  32. Kashani V, Mo'menzadeh M, BaGHerli J. The effect of trial-error learning and practice variability on mental effort and throwing performance. Motor behavior. 2020; 12 (40): 37–50. In Persian https://doi.org/10.22089/mbj.2019.6041.1693
روانشناسی ورزش
دوره 15، شماره 1
1402
صفحه 126-141

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 19 آذر 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 27 بهمن 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 12 اسفند 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار