تأثیر بازخورد توجهی مسافت و زمان بر اقتصاد دویدن و درک فشار در افراد مبتدی

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

2 دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

هدف: نوع تمرکز توجه بیرونی بر وضعیت فیزیولوژیکی و روان‌شناختی افراد حین دویدن اثر دارد. هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی تأثیر بازخورد توجهی مسافت و زمان بر اقتصاد دویدن و درک فشار افراد مبتدی بود.
روش‌ها: چهل‌وپنج نفر دانشجوی دختر (30-20 سال) دویدن روی تردمیل را انجام دادند. شرکت‌کنندگان داوطلبانه انتخاب شدند. به‌منظور اندازه‌گیری سرعت بیشینه ، سرعت تردمیل با 2 کیلومتر بر ساعت شروع شد و پس از هر دقیقه سرعت2 کیلومتر بر ساعت افزایش یافت. این روند تا خستگی ارادی شرکت کننده ادامه داشت. شرکت‌کنندگان به‌صورت همگن بر اساس سرعت بیشینه به 3 گروه (15 نفری) زمان، مسافت و کنترل تقسیم شدند. به‌منظور ارزیابی تأثیر بازخورد توجهی به افراد گروه مسافت، بازخورد میزان مسافت (مسافتی که در هر دقیقه و درمجموع 6 دقیقه پیمودند) و به افراد گروه زمان بازخورد زمان (هر دقیقه یک‌بار و در کل زمان 6 دقیقه، بازخورد مدت‌زمان دویدن داده شد) و گروه کنترل هیچ‌گونه بازخوردی دریافت نکردند. با دستگاه تجزیه گازهای تنفسی و کمربند ضربان قلب به مدت 6 دقیقه‌، اطلاعات فیزیولوژیک و ضربان قلب ثبت شد. از آزمون درک فشار بورگ برای درک خستگی افراد استفاده شد.
نتایج: بین میزان اکسیژن مصرفی ، ضربان قلب ، حجم تنفسی و تواتر تنفس و درک فشار بورگ در سه گروه بازخورد توجهی مسافت، بازخورد توجهی زمان و گروه کنترل تفاوت معناداری وجود نداشت(p<0/05).
نتیجه‌گیری: احتمالاً بهره‌مندی از بازخورد توجهی مسافت و زمان در شرایط آزمایشگاهی، سطح مهارت و نوع مهارت تأثیر متفاوتی بر میزان انرژی مصرفی و درک فشار افراد مبتدی نداشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Spatial and temporal attentional feedback on running economy and perceived pressure in inexperienced runners

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahin Aghdaei 1
  • maryam kavyani 1
  • Azita Rezaei 2
1 Assistant Professor Shahid Beheshti University
2 Shahid Beheshti university
چکیده [English]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of spatial and temporal attentional feedback on physiological and psychological scales in running among inexperienced women.
Methods: Forty-five students (20 to 30 years old) took part in the study. In order to measure the participant’s Vmax, the speed of the treadmill started at 2 km / h and increased to 2 km / h after every one minute. This process continued until the fatigue will appear. According to the results of the maximum speed test, the participants were divided into 3 groups: temporal (n = 15), spatial (n = 15), and control group (n = 15). Feedback was given to the spatial group including the amount of distance that they traveled per minute (totally in 6 minutes), and the temporal feedback group (once per minute, total time 6 minutes), and the control group did not receive any feedback. During running, heart rates, Vo2max, and oxygen consumption were assessed. The Borg pressure perceived test was also used to measure perceive fatigue.
Results: Results showed that there was no significant difference between oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate (HR), respiratory volume (VE), respiratory frequency (BF), and the Borg pressure in the three groups of spatial feedback, temporal feedback, and control group. (p >0/05). Conclusion: The results revealed that the effect of spatial and temporal feedback in laboratory conditions, skill level, and type of skill had no significant effect on the energy consumption and perceived pressure in inexperienced participants.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Oxygen Consumption
  • Running Performance
  • Borg scale
  • Heart Rate
1. Ramze M, Rajabi H, Nouroziyan M. Acute
effect of static and dynamic traction on running
economy and some sub-maximal metabolic
factors in active women. Olampic.2012;20(4):60-
73 [ persian].
2. Tucker R. The anticipatory regulation of
performance: the physiological basis for pacing
strategies and the development of a perceptionbased model for exercise performance. British
journal of sports medicine. 2009;43(6):392-400 . 3. Pageaux B. The Psychobiological Model of
Endurance Performance: An Effort-Based
Decision-Making Theory to Explain Self-Paced
Endurance Performance. Sports Medicine.
2014;44(9):1319-20 .
4. St Clair Gibson A, Lambert EV, Rauch LH,
Tucker R, Baden DA, Foster C, et al. The role of
information processing between the brain and
peripheral physiological systems in pacing and
perception of effort. Sports medicine (Auckland,
NZ). 2006;36(8):705-22 .
5. Ashare RL, Kable JW. Sex differences in time
perception during smoking abstinence. Nicotine
Tob Res. 2015;17(4):449-54.
6. Brick N, MacIntyre T, Campbell M. Attentional
focus in endurance activity: new paradigms and
future directions. International Review of Sport
and Exercise Psychology. 2014;7(1):106-34 .
7. Wulf G. Attentional focus and motor learning:
a review of 15 years. International Review of
Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2013;77(1): 77-
104.
8. Wulf G, McNevin N, Shea CH. The automaticity
of complex motor skill learning as a function of
attentional focus. The Quarterly journal of
experimental psychology A, Human
experimental psychology. 2001;54(4):1143-54 .
9. Stoate I, Wulf G. Does the attentional focus
adopted by swimmers affect their performance?
International Journal of Sports Science &
Coaching. 2011;6(1):99-108.
10. Wulf G, Su J. An External Focus of Attention
Enhances Golf Shot Accuracy in Beginners and
Experts. Research Quarterly for Exercise and
Sport. 2007;78(4):384-9 .
11. Connolly CT, Janelle CM. Attentional
Strategies in Rowing: Performance, Perceived
Exertion, and Gender Considerations. Journal of
Applied Sport Psychology. 2003;15(3):195-212 .
12. Wulf G, Höß M ,Prinz W. Instructions for
Motor Learning: Differential Effects of Internal
Versus External Focus of Attention. Journal of
Motor Behavior. 1998;30(2):169-79 .
13. Wulf G, Prinz W. Directing attention to
movement effects enhances learning: A review.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2001;8(4):648-
60 .
14. aghdaei m, farsi a, khalaji m. Investigating
Running economy in beginners: The role of
associative and dissociative attentional focus
with internal and external dimensions. Motor
Behavior. 2019 .-:
15. aghdaei m ,farsi a, khalaji m. The role of
associative and dissociative attentional focus
with internal and external dimensions on blood
lactate and Borg Ratings of Perceived Exertion
Scale. Journal of sport managment and motor
behaviour. 2020;Article in press.
16. Daniels J, Daniels N. Running economy of
elite male and elite female runners. Med Sci
Sports Exerc. 1992;24(4):483-9.
17. Morgan DW, Bransford DR, Costill DL, Daniels
JT, Howley ET, Krahenbuhl GS. Variation in the
aerobic demand of running among trained and
untrained subjects. Med Sci Sports Exerc.
1995;27(3):404-9 .
18. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and
learning : a behavioral emphasis. Leeds: Human
Kinetics; 2011 .
19. Sparrow WA, Newell KM. Metabolic energy
expenditure and the regulation of movement
economy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
1998;5(2):173-96 .
20. Chinnasamy C, St Clair Gibson A,
Micklewright D. Effect of spatial and temporal
cues on athletic pacing in schoolchildren. Med
Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(2):395-402 .
21. Ziv G, Meckel Y, Lidor R, Rotstein A. The
effects of external and internal focus of attention
on physiological responses during running. 2012.
2012;7(3):9 .22. Smith DL, Fernhall B. Advanced
cardiovascular exercise physiology. Champaign,
IL: Human Kinetics; 2011 .
23. Ravanbakhsh R, Moazam M,Torbat H. The
effect of internal and external attention on the
running economy of skilled and
beginners.Master theses of Ferdosi university.
2014. [ persian].
24. Schücker L, Anheier W, Hagemann N, Strauss
B, Völker K. On the optimal focus of attention for
efficient running at high intensity. Sport,
Exercise, and Performance Psychology.
2013;2(3):207-19 .
25. Gray R. Attending to the Execution of a
Complex Sensorimotor Skill: Expertise
Differences, Choking, and Slumps. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Applied.
2004;10(1):42-54 .
26. Smith DL, Fernhall B. Advanced
cardiovascular exercise physiology. Champaign,
IL: Human Kinetics; 2011.
27. Ravanbakhsh R, Moazam M,Torbat H. The
effect of internal and external attention on the
running economy of skilled and
beginners.Master theses of Ferdosi university.
2014. [ persian].
28. Gray R. Attending to the Execution of a
Complex Sensorimotor Skill: Expertise
Differences, Choking, and Slumps. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Applied.
2004;10(1):42-54