تاثیر پرآموزی و فواصل تمرین‌آسایی متفاوت بر تحکیم مبتنی بر ثبات و تداخل پس‌گستر در حافظۀ حرکتی آشکار

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه رفتار حرکتی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 گروه رفتار حرکتی، واحد کرج ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، کرج، ایران

3 گروه رفتارحرکتی، پژوهشگاه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

چکیده:هدف: تا کنون بهترین فواصل تمرین‌آسایی برای وقوع تحکیم حافظه تعیین نشده است و این فواصل متنوع هستند و این‌که آیا پرآموزی باعث یادداری به روشی که واقعاً سودمند باشد، بحث برانگیز بوده است. هدف از این تحقیق تأثیر پرآموزی فواصل مختلف تمرین‌آسایی بر روند تحکیم مبتنی بر ثبات و تداخل پس‌گستر در حافظۀ حرکتی آشکار بود.روش‌ها: در این پژوهش نیمه تجربی، شرکت کنندگان شامل 60 نفر از دانشجویان دختر با دامنه سنی 20 تا 30 سال بودند که به صورت داوطلبانه فراخوانده شدند. شرکت کنندگان پس از داشتن معیارهای ورود به مطالعه به صورت بلوک‌‏بندی تصادفی در 6 گروه آزمایشی با  فواصل تمرین آسایی 5 دقیقه  و24 ساعت ، با دو عامل پرآموزی شده و پرآموزی نشده و دو گروه کنترل تقسیم شدند. این تحقیق شامل دو مرحلۀ اکتساب و یادداری و تکلیف اول (ضربۀ فورهند) و تکلیف دوم (ضربۀ بک‌هند) بودنتایج: یافته‌های آزمون آنالیز واریانس با اندازه‌گیری مکرر نشان داد، اول، تمرین‌آسایی به تنهایی (24 ساعت و 5 دقیقه) برای یادگیری یک تکلیف کافی نیست. دوم ، تکلیف اول در فواصل تمرین‌آسایی (24 ساعت و 5 دقیقه) با پرآموزی، تحکیم یافت و یادگیری تکلیف اول (ضربه فورهند) در برابر تداخل پس‌گستر تکیف دوم (ضربه بک‌هند) مقاوم شد.نتیجه‌گیری: به نظر می‌رسد که پرآموزی می‌تواند نقش مهمی در حافظۀ حرکتی آشکار داشته باشد، اما تمرین‌آسایی در حافظۀ حرکتی آشکار به تنهایی نمی‌تواند مانع از ایجاد تداخل پس‌گستر شود. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که تداخل مداوم و پایدار را می‌توان به اثرات پس‌گستر بر بازیابی حافظه نسبت داد.                           

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of off-line time and over-learning different periods on Stabilization-Based Consolidation process and retroactive Interference in expilicit Memory

نویسندگان [English]

  • Somayeh Bakhshi 1
  • Jaleh Bagherli 2
  • Saleh Rafiee 3
1 Department of Motor Behavior, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Motor Behavior, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
3 Department of Motor Behavior, Sport Science Research Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

AbstractPurpose: So far, the best periods has not been set for off-line and for memory consolidation to occur and these periods vary, and whether over- learning enhances retention in a way that is really beneficial has been controversial. The aim of this research was the effect of over- learning and off-line different periods on Stabilization-Based Consolidation process and retroactive Interference in explicit Memory.Methods: In this semi- experimental research, Participants included 60 female students between the ages of 20 and 30 who were voluntarily selected. The participants after meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into 6 experimental groups with periods of 5 minute, 24 hours in offline with two factors over-learning and non-over-learning and two control groups.This research consisted of two phases of learning and retention and the initial task (forehand kick) and the second (backhand kick) task was used for this research. Results: Findings of ANOVA with repeated measure emerge from our results. First, off-line alone (24 hours and 5 minutes) is not enough to learn an assignment. Second, initial task at off-line times (24 hours and 5 minutes), the over- learning was consolidation, and the learning of the forehand kick became resistant to backhand kick interference.Conclusion: According to the results, suggest that over- learning can play a significant role in explicit motor memory, but the off-line in explicit motor memory alone cannot make retroactive interference resistant. The results show that continuous and sustained interference can be attributed to the retroactive effects of memory retrieval.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Consolidation
  • over-learning
  • off line periods
  • retroactive Interference
  • Motor explicit Memory

مراجع

1. Lechner HA, Squire LR, Byrne JH. 100 years of
consolidation—remembering Müller and
Pilzecker. Learning & Memory. 1999 , 6(2): 77-
87.
2. Josselyn SA, Köhler S, Frankland PW. Finding
the engram. Nature Reviews Neuroscience .
2015, 16(9): 521-534.
3. McGaugh J L. Memory--a century of
consolidation. Science . 2000; 287(5451): 248-
251.
4. Wilson JK, Baran B, Pace-Schott EF, Ivry RB,
Spencer R M. Sleep modulates word-pair
learning but not motor sequence learning in
healthy older adults. Neurobiology of aging.
2012; 33(5): 991-1000.
5. King BR, Hoedlmoser K, Hirschauer F, Dolfen
N, Albouy G. Sleeping on the motor engram: the
multifaceted nature of sleep-related motor
memory consolidation. Neuroscience &
Biobehavioral Reviews. 2017; 80, 1-22.
6. Robertson EM, Pascual-LeoneA, Miall RC.
Current concepts in procedural consolidation.
Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2004; 5(7): 576-
582.
7. Robertson EM, Pascual-Leone A, Press DZ.
Awareness modifies the skill-learning benefits of
sleep. Current biology. 2004;14(3): 208-212.
8. Diekelmann S, Wilhelm I, Born J. The whats
and whens of sleep-dependent memory
consolidation. Sleep medicine reviews.
2009;13(5);309-321.
9. Ghilardi MF, Moisello C, Silvestri G, Ghez C,
Krakauer JW. Learning of a sequential motor skill
comprises explicit and implicit components that
consolidate differently. Journal of
neurophysiology. 2009;101(5):2218-29.
10. Krakauer JW, Ghez C, Ghilardi MF.
Adaptation to visuomotor transformations:
consolidation, interference, and forgetting.
Journal of Neuroscience. 2005;25(2):473-8.
11. Krakauer JW. Motor learning and
consolidation: the case of visuomotor rotation.
In Progress in motor control. 2009: pp. 405-421.
12. Shibata K, Sasaki Y, Bang JW, Walsh EG,
Machizawa MG, Tamaki M, Chang LH, Watanabe
T. Overlearning hyperstabilizes a skill by rapidly
making neurochemical processing inhibitorydominant. Nature neuroscience.
2017;20(3):470-5.
13. Ebbinghaus H. Memory (ha ruger & ce
bussenius, trans.). New York: Teachers
College.(Original work 1885. 1913;39.
14. Robertson EM, Pascual-Leone A, Miall RC.
Current concepts in procedural consolidation.
Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2004;5(7):576-
82.
15. Goedert KM, Willingham DB. Patterns of
interference in sequence learning and prism
adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation
hypothesis. Learning & memory. 2002 ;9(5):279-92.
16. Walker MP, Brakefield T, Hobson JA,
Stickgold R. Dissociable stages of human
memory consolidation and reconsolidation.
Nature. 2003;425(6958):616-20.
17. Shamsipour P. Effect of immediate, recent
and remote explicit motor memory on
reconsolidation process and retrograde effect.
Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2014;2(3):37-48.
( In Persian)
18. Asgari Z, Abdoli B, Aslankhani M. Comparison
of the effect of overt, deductive and exploratory
learning on acquisition, retention and transfer of
table tennis top spin skills.Journal of Movement
Behavior.1391; 11: 81-98.( In Persian)
19. Romano Bergstrom JC, Howard Jr JH, Howard
DV. Enhanced implicit sequence learning in
college‐age video game players and musicians.
Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2012;26(1):91-6.
20. Kaseb MRS, Mehranian A. The comparison of
two types of physical fitness on consolidation
(Based on promotion) of Students’ explicit motor
memory. EDCBMJ. 2017; 9(6): 439- 446 2017;
9(6): 439- 446. ( In Persian)
21. Donchin O, Sawaki L, Madupu G, Cohen L G,
Shadmehr R. Mechanisms influencing
acquisition and recall of motor memories.
Journal of neurophysiology. 2002; 88(4): 2114-
2123.
22. Stickgold R, James L, Hobson JA. Visual
discrimination learning requires sleep after
training. Nature neuroscience. 2000;
3(12):1237-1238.
23. Walker M P, Brakefield T, Seidman J, Morgan
A, Hobson J A, Stickgold R. Sleep and the time
course of motor skill learning. Learning &
memory. 2003; 10(4), 275-284.
24. Shamsipour P, Abdolshahy M. The effect of
different recall distances on explicit motor
memory consolidation. Journal of Cognitive
Psychology. 2015; 2 (4): 36-45.( In Persian)
25. Shams A, Effect of off-line time different
periods on stabilization and enhancement-based
consolidation process in explicit memory.
Journal of Movement Behavior.1394; 21: 127-
144.( In Persian)
26. Fischer S, Hallschmid M, Elsner AL, Born J.
Sleep forms memory for finger skills.
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences. 2002; 99(18):11987-11991.
27. Sosic-Vasic Z, Hille K, Kröner J, Spitzer M,
Kornmeier J. When learning disturbs memory–
Temporal profile of retroactive interference of
learning on memory formation. Frontiers in
psychology. 2018;9:82.
28. Caithness G, Osu R, Bays P, Chase H, Klassen
J, Kawato M, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR. Failure to
consolidate the consolidation theory of learning
for sensorimotor adaptation tasks. Journal of
Neuroscience. 2004;24(40):8662-71.
29. Unsworth N, Brewer GA, Spillers GJ. Focusing
the search: Proactive and retroactive
interference and the dynamics of free recall.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition. 2013;39(6):1742.
30. Robertson EM. From creation to
consolidation: a novel framework for memory
processing. PLoS biology. 2009;7(1).
31. Wixted JT. The psychology and neuroscience
of forgetting. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2004;55:235-
69.
32. Friedman GN, Johnson L, Williams ZM. Longterm visual memory and its role in learning
suppression. Frontiers in psychology.
2018;9:1896.
33. Hauptmann B, Karni A. From primed to learn:
the saturation of repetition priming and the
induction of long-term memory. Cognitive Brain
Research. 2002;13(3):313-22.
34. Hauptmann B, Reinhart E, Brandt SA, Karni A.
The predictive value of the leveling off of within
session performance for procedural memory consolidation. Cognitive Brain Research.
2005;24(2):181-9.
35. Cohen DA, Robertson EM. Motor sequence
consolidation: constrained by critical time
windows or competing components.
Experimental brain research. 2007;177(4):440-6.
36. Walker MP, Stickgold R, Alsop D, Gaab N,
Schlaug G. Sleep-dependent motor memory
plasticity in the human brain. Neuroscience.
2005;133(4):911-7.
37. Keisler A, Shadmehr R. A shared resource
between declarative memory and motor
memory. Journal of Neuroscience.
2010;30(44):14817-23.
38. Li X, Morton SM. Explicit Awareness does not
Modulate Retrograde Interference Effects in
Sequence Learning. Journal of motor behavior.
2019;51(1):68-74

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 09 تیر 1399
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 30 فروردین 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 01 خرداد 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار