شناسایی ویژگی‌های مربی به‌عنوان منبعی در کارآمدی فردی و جمعی ورزشکاران تیم ملی والیبال ایران

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)

2 مدیر گروه مطالعات شهری جهاد دانشگاهی واحد اصفهان

چکیده

هدف: هدف از این پژوهش، شناسایی ویژگی­های مربی به­عنوان منبعی در کارآمدی فردی و جمعی ورزشکاران تیم ملی والیبال ایران بود.روش: در این مطالعه با رویکردی کیفی از روش پدیدار‌شناسی استفاده شد. جامعة مورد پژوهش، ورزشکاران عضو تیم­ های ملی والیبال ایران در سال 2014 بوده که مشارکت ­کنندگان (10مرد و 4 زن) به صورت هدفمند و داوطلبانه در این مطالعه شرکت کردند. برای گردآوری اطلاعات، از مصاحبه‌های نیمه ساختاریافته استفاده شد. داده‌ها از روش تحلیل مضمون مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند. اعتبار و قابلیت اعتماد نتایج ارزیابی شد.یافته­ها: طبق یافته­ های مصاحبه، منابع کارآمدی مشارکت­ کنندگان در دو مقولة اصلی کارآمدی فردی و جمعی ارائه شد. در نهایت 4 کد تبیینی در مقولة کارآمدی فردی شامل "تشویق و انگیزه مربی"، "ایمان مربی به بازیکن"، "دانش فنی و روانشناختی" و "موفقیت­های گذشته" و 3 کد تبیینی در مقولة کارآمدی جمعی شامل " قدرت هبری"، "حمایت اجتماعی مربی" و "موفقیت­های گذشته" شناسایی گردید. موفقیت­های گذشته کد مشترک بین کارآمدی فردی و جمعی می­باشد.نتیجه­ گیری: پژوهش حاضر اهمیت دادن به موضوع کارآمدی مربیان برای رسیدن به موفقیت­های بیشتر ورزش والیبال ایران در عرصه ­های بین­ اللملی را پیشنهاد می کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identify the characteristics of the coach as a source of individual and collective efficiency athletes’ Iranian national volleyball team

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Mohammadi 1
  • Zohreh Meshkati 1
  • Mehdi Zhianpour 2
1 Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan)
2 Director of Urban Studies Department, University Jihad, Isfahan Branch
چکیده [English]

Aim: The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics of the coach into account as the source of individual and collective efficiency Iran's national team athletes.
Methods: In this qualitative study of phenomenological method was used. The sample population of, athletes, members of Iran's national volleyball team was in 2014 that the participants (10 men and 4 women) purposefully and voluntarily participated in this study. For data collection, semi-structured interviews were used. Data were analyzed using content analysis.
Results: The results were evaluated for reliability and validity. The results of the interviews, participants of collective efficacy two main concepts of individual and collective efficiency were presented. The 3 code efficiency explanatory category of person, including "encouragement and motivation the coach", "Faith the coach to player" and "technical and psychological knowledge"; and 3 explanatory code included in the category of collective efficacy "of leadership", "social support the coach" and "past successes" were identified.
Conclusion: This study is the importance of the issue of efficiency coaches to achieve further successes in the areas of international volleyball Iran suggests.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Phenomenology
  • Collective Efficacy
  • Personal Efficienc
  • Coach
  • Volleyball

مراجع

  1. Horn, T.S. (2008). Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain. In T.S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in Sport Psychology Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 3rd ed., 239-267.
  2. Artoonian, A., Noorbakhsh, M. (2014)." The Relationship between Thinking Styles and the sources of power among basketball coaches". International peer- reviewed Journal, 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e).
  3. Woodz, B. (2007). Sport Psychology. Translator: Malibu, F. Tehran, Bamdad Publication. . (In Persian).
  4. Ramezani Nejad, R., Hosseini, K., Benar, N., Mohaddes, F. (2010), "The Relationship of Coaching Styles with Group Integrity and the Success of Volleyball Students in Islamic Azad University Students", Sports Management Journal, 12, 29-46. (In Persian)
  5. Poursolantani., A. (2009), "Accreditation and Reliability of the 360 Degree Feedback Scale for Leadership in Sport Management", Research Project, Educational Research Institute and Sport Sciences. (In Persian)
  6. Afzalopour, M E., Gharakhanlou, R., Khodadad, A. (2004), "Assessment of the role of foreign coaches in the success of national and Iranian soccer clubs", Olympic magazine, 27. 71-51. (In Persian)
  7. Vargas-Tonsing, T.M, Myers, N.D, & Feltz D.L, (2004). "Coaches’ and Athletes’ Perceptions of Efficacy-Enhancing Techniques", The Sport Psychologist, 18, 397-414.
  8. Bandura, A. (1986). "Social foundation of though and action: A social cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs", NJ: Prentice Hall, 41, 389-391.
  9. Boardley, I.D., Kavussanu, & M, Ring, C. (2008). "Athletes Perceptions of coaching effectiveness and Athlete-Related Outcomes in Rugby Union: An investigation Based on the Coaching Efficacy Model." The Sport Psychologist, 22, 269-287.
  10. Sullivan P, Paquette K.J, Holt N.L. Bloom G.A, (2012). The Relation of coaching context and coach education to coaching efficacy and perceived leadership behaviors in youth sport. The sport psychologist, 26, 122-134.
  11. Chu. R., & John Tingzon, Ch. (2009). "The Relationship of Coaching Competency on the Athlete’s Self-efficacy and Hope". The International Journal of Research and Review. 1
  12. Feltz. D.L., Chase. M.A., Moritz. S.E., & Sullivan. P.J. (1999). "A conceptual model of coaching efficacy: preliminary investigation and instrument development", Journal of Educational Psychology, 91.4, 765-77.
  13. Malete. L., & Sullivan. P., (2009). "Sources of coaching efficacy in coaches in Botswana, International", Journal of Coaching Science, 3, 1, 17-27.
  14. Myers, N.D., Vargas-Tonsing. T.M, & Feltz. D.L., (2005). "Coaching efficacy in intercollegiate coaches: sources, coaching behavior, and team variables", Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 6, 129–143.
  15. Baker, J., cote, J., & Hawes, R. (2000). "The relationship between coaching behaviors and sport anxiety in athletes". Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport,3, (2), 110-119.
  16. -Richard, C.T., Andrew, M.L., Neil, J.V.W.&Iain A.G., (2008). "Examining relationship between emotional intelligence and coaching efficacy", International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 6, 224-23.
  17. Carron, A.V., Spink, K.S., & Prapavessis, H. (1997). "Team building and cohesiveness in the sport and exercise setting: Use of indirect intervention", Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 9: 61-72.
  18. Carron, A.V. (1982). "Cohesiveness in sport Interpretations and considerations", Journal of Sports Psychology, 4. 123-126.
  19. Gondi. (1998). Coach Assessment from. http:/www. Vemp.learninq.orq, Docs/ecadoo.75. htm.
  20. Chase, M.A., Feltz, D.L., Hayashi, S.W., & Hepler, I.J. (2005). "Sources of coaching efficacy: The coaches' perspective", International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, I: 7-25.
  21. Trninic, V., Papic, V., & Trninic, M., (2009). "Role of expert coaches in development of top-level athletes in individual and team sports", Acta Kinesiologica, 3(1), 99-106.
  22. -Heuze, J. P., Bosselut, G., & Thomas, J. P. (2007). "Should the Coaches of Elite Female Handball Teams Focus on Collective Efficacy or Group Cohesion? The Sport Psychologist, 21, 383-399.
  23. Manley, A., Greenlees, I., Thelwell, R., & Smith, M. (2010). "Athletes' Use of Reputation and Gender Information When Forming Initial Expectancies of Coaches", International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 5, 517-532.
  24. Myers, N., Feltz, D., & Chase, M. (2011). "Proposed Modifications to the Conceptual Model of Coaching Efficacy and Additional Validity Evidence for the Coaching Efficacy Scale II-High School Teams", Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 79- 15.
  25. Shafizadeh, M. B., A. (2009). Validity and reliability Iranian athletic confidence. Institute of Physical Education and Sport Sciences. The Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, 25, 31-48. (In Persian)
  26. Cohen. L., Lawrence. M., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods in 3th Education. Routledge & Falmer-Dane.
  27. Morse, J. M., (2001). "Myth # 93: Reliability and validity are not relevant to qualitative inquiry". Qualitative health research, 9, 717.
  28. Braun, V. & Clarke, V., (2006)."Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology". Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
  29. King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in Qualitative Research. London: Sage, 153.
  30. Naderian Jahromi M. (2009). Fundamentals of Sociology in Sport, Bamdad Publishing Books, Tehran. (In Persian).
  31. Ismaili, M R. (2003)."General principles of physical activity". Zanafrooz Publications, Tehran. (In Persian)
  32. Beauchamp, M., Bray, S., Fidding, A., & Eys, M., (2005). "A multilevel investigation of the relationship between role ambiguity and role efficacy in sport", Psychology of sport. Psychology of exercise, 6, 289- 302.
  33. Chen, M. H. (2007). "Exploring the relationship between effective coaching leadership, group cohesion, and achievement motivation in college basketball teams in Taiwan. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation", Sport Management, United States Sports Academy, 88(10).
  34. Chu. R., & John Tingzon, Ch. (2009). "The Relationship of Coaching Competency on the Athlete’s Self-efficacy and Hope". The International Journal of Research and Review. 1
  35. Lawson, R., Shen, Z. (2002), Organizational Behavior and Organizational Psychology, Basics and

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 29 آذر 1394
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 22 بهمن 1399
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 11 دی 1399

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار