پیش‌بینی مشکلات بین فردی دانشجویان تربیت بدنی براساس طرحواره‌های ناسازگار اولیه: نقش میانجیگری احساس شرم و گناه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد روانشناسی بالینی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی قم، قم، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه روانشناسی، واحد آستارا، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، آستارا، ایران.

3 استادیار گروه آموزش روانشناسی و مشاوره، پردیس فاطمه الزهرا، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر پیش‌بینی مشکلات بین فردی در دانشجویان تربیت بدنی براساس طرحواره‌های ناسازگار اولیه با میانجیگری احساس شرم و گناه بود.
روش‌ها: روش پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی و مدلیابی معادلات ساختاری بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش را تمام دانشجویان مشغول به تحصیل در دانشگاه‌ آزاد واحد قم در سال 1402 تشکیل می­دادند که از میان آنها 320 نفر به روش نمونه­گیری دردسترس انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش شامل مقیاس مشکلات بین فردی-47 پیلکونیس و همکاران (1996)؛ نسخه کوتاه پرسشنامه طرحواره یانگ (2006)؛ مقیاس تجربه شرم اندروز و هانتر (1997)؛ پرسشنامه گناه کوگلر و جونز (1992) بود. برای تحلیل داده­ها از روش مدلیابی معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد مشکلات بین فردی براساس طرحواره­های ناسازگار اولیه با میانجیگری احساس شرم (001/0=P، 73/3=Z) و گناه (001/0=P، 11/4=Z) در دانشجویان تربیت بدنی پیش بینی می­شود.
نتیجه گیری: بنابراین، به‌کارگیری مداخلات روان‌شناختی مبتنی بر طرحواره‌درمانی همراه با برنامه‌های تربیت بدنی و فعالیت‌های ورزشی گروهیِ هدفمند می‌تواند با کاهش شرم و گناه، به بهبود روابط بین‌فردی و کارآمدی اجتماعی این دانشجویان کمک کند.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Prediction of Interpersonal Problems in Physical Education Students Based on Early Maladaptive Schemas: The Mediating Role of Shame and Guilt

نویسندگان [English]

  • Atefeh Ghasem Amoueian 1
  • Pouran Sourati 2
  • Zahedeh Rahmanian 3
1 Master of Clinical Psychology, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
2 Department of Psychology, Astara Branch, Islamic Azad University, Astara, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor of Farhangian University, Fatemeh Al-Zahra Campus, Department of Psychology and Counselling, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Purpose: The present study aimed to predict interpersonal problems in physical education students based on early maladaptive schemas, with the mediating roles of shame and guilt.
Methods: The research method was descriptive-correlational, utilizing structural equation modeling (SEM). The statistical population consisted of all students enrolled in Qom branch of Islamic Azad University during the 2023, from whom 320 participants were selected using convenience sampling. Research instruments included the Interpersonal Problems Inventory–47 developed by Pilkonis et al. (1996), the short form of Young’s Schema Questionnaire (2006), the Experience of Shame Scale by Andrews and Hunter (1997), and the Guilt Questionnaire by Kugler and Jones (1992). Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling techniques.
Results: The results indicated that interpersonal problems in physical education students can be significantly predicted by early maladaptive schemas through the mediating effects of shame (Z=3.73, P<0.001) and guilt (Z = 4.11, P<0.001).
Conclusion: Accordingly, the implementation of psychological interventions grounded in schema therapy, alongside structured physical education programs and targeted group-based sports activities, may reduce feelings of shame and guilt and consequently contribute to the improvement of interpersonal relationships and social functioning among these students.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Physical Education
  • Shame
  • Early Maladaptive Schemas
  • Guilt
  • Interpersonal Problems

مراجع

  1. Zaeimzadeh L, Lotfi M, Amini M. The role of personality functions in predicting interpersonal and emotional problems. Mazandaran Univ Med Sci J. 2020;30(190):97–108. In Persian
  2. Peyvastegar M. Borderline personality disorder and alexithymia among female students with interpersonal problems. Khatam Neurosci. 2018;6(2):51–9.

http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/shefa.6.2.51

  1. Young JE. Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: a schemas-focused approach. Professional Resource Exchange Inc; 1990. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1990-97882-000
  2. Farrell JM, Shaw IA, Behary WT, Young JE. Experiencing Schema Therapy from the Inside Out. Guilford Press; 2017.
  3. Farrell JM. The Schema Therapy Clinician’s Guide. 1st ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2014.
  4. Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME. Schema therapy: a practitioner’s guide. 1st ed. Guilford Press; 2006.
  5. Macaulay R, Cohen A. Self-conscious emotions’ role in functional outcomes within clinical populations. Psychiatry Res. 2014;216(1):17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.01.022
  6. Meesters C, Muris P, Dibbets P, Cima M, Lemmens L. On the link between perceived parental rearing behaviors and self-conscious emotions in adolescents. J Child Fam Stud. 2017;26(6):1536–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0695-7
  7. Janovsky T, Clark GI, Rock AJ. Trait mindfulness mediates the relationship between early maladaptive schema and interpersonal problems. Aust Psychol. 2019;54(5):391–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12390
  8. Janovsky T, Rock AJ, Thorsteinsson EB, Clark GI, Murray CV. The relationship between early maladaptive schemas and interpersonal problems: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020;27(3):408–47. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32112606/
  9. Khazaei M, Safaei Rad I. Predicting interpersonal problems based on early maladaptive schemas and self-concept. 2021. In Persian
  10. Mojallal M, Simons RM, Simons JS. Childhood maltreatment and adulthood proneness to shame and guilt: The mediating role of maladaptive schemas. Motiv Emot. 2021;45(2):197–210. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2021-18648-001
  11. Sójta K, Strzelecki D. Early Maladaptive Schemas and Their Impact on Parenting: Do Dysfunctional Schemas Pass Generationally?-A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(4). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9963559/
  12. Pilkonis PA, Kim Y, Proietti JM, Barkham M. Scales for personality disorders developed from the inventory of interpersonal problems. J Pers Disord. 1996;10(4):355–69. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-02361-006
  13. Aftab R. The mediating role of interpersonal difficulties in the relationship between experiential avoidance and depression and anxiety. Appl Psychol Q. 2016;10(4, consecutive 40):521–40. In Persian
  14. Sadooghi Z, Aguilar-Vafaie ME, Rasoulzadeh Tabatabaie K, Esfehanian N. Factor analysis of the Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form in a nonclinical Iranian sample. Iran J Psychiatry Clin Psychol. 2008;14(2):214–9. In Persian
  15. Andrews B, Qian M, Valentine JD. Predicting depressive symptoms with a new measure of shame: the Experience of Shame Scale. Br J Clin Psychol. 2002;41(1):29–42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11931676/
  16. Kugler K, Jones WH. On conceptualizing and assessing guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992;62(2):318–27. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1992-18274-001
  17. Aftab R, Bermas H, Abolmaali Al-Hosseini K. Structural model of predicting suicidal ideation based on the five-factor personality traits with guilt as a mediator. J Disabil Stud. 2020;11(1):106–16. In Persian
  18. Dehghani S, Khorramai F. The relationship between moral character and aggression in students: the mediating role of shame and guilt emotions. Soc Psychol Res. 2021;11(44):47–72. In Persian
  19. Mojallal M, Hakim Javadi M, Mousavi SVA, Hosseinkhanzadeh AA, Gholam Ali Lavasani M. Early maladaptive schemas and interpersonal problems in Iranian university students. Pract Clin Psychol. 2015;3(1):11–22. In Persian
  20. Janovsky T, Rock AJ, Thorsteinsson EB, Clark GI, Polad V, Cosh S. Assessing the relationship between early maladaptive schemas and interpersonal problems using interpersonal scenarios depicting rejection. PLoS One. 2023;18(10):e0288543. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288543
  21. Bär A, Bär HE, Rijkeboer MM, Lobbestael J. Early Maladaptive Schemas and Schema Modes in clinical disorders: A systematic review. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2023;96(3):716–47. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2023-63592-001

24.Thimm JC, Chang M. Early Maladaptive Schemas and Mental Disorders in Adulthood: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2022;15(4):371–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-022-00149-7

  1. Scott S, Crino RD. Early maladaptive schema and social and occupational functioning: The mediating role of psychiatric symptomatology. Australian Journal of Psychology. 2014;66(4):224–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12061
  2. Fassbinder E, Wilde OB-d, Arntz A. Chapter 5 - Case Formulation in Schema Therapy: Working with the Mode Model. In: Kramer U, editor. Case Formulation for Personality Disorders: Academic Press; 2019. 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813521-1.00005-9
  3. Ehsan HB, Bahramizadeh H. Early Maladaptive Schemas and Agreeableness in Personality Five Factor Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011;30:547–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.107
  4. Kaya Tezel F, Tutarel Kişlak Ş, Boysan M. Relationships between Childhood Traumatic Experiences, Early Maladaptive Schemas and Interpersonal Styles. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2015;52(3):226–32. https://doi.org/10.5152/npa.2015.7118
روانشناسی ورزش
دوره 16، شماره 1
1403
صفحه 341-354

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 22 خرداد 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 21 مهر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 08 بهمن 1402

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار