روانشناسی ورزش

روانشناسی ورزش

ارتباط حس شوخ طبعی مربیان با اثربخشی کار گروهی ورزشکاران: نقش میانجی‌گر سرمایه روان‌شناختی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
منیر رستم آبادی 1
عهدیه یداله زاده 2
گلین مهدی نژاد گرجی 3
سیده فاطمه نصیرخانی 4
1 دکتری روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران.
2 استادیار، گروه تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران‌، ایران.
3 استادیار، گروه روانشناسی، موسسه آموزش عالی طبری، بابل، ایران.
4 کارشناسی ارشد، روانشناسی تربیتی، موسسه آموزش عالی فروردین، قائم شهر، ایران.
10.48308/mbsp.2024.105107.1284
چکیده
هدف: هدف تحقیق حاضر بررسی رابطه حس شوخ طبعی مربیان با اثربخشی کار گروهی در ورزشکاران و نقش میانجی­گر سرمایه روانشناختی بود.
روش‌ها: پژوهش حاضر از نظر روش از نوع مطالعات همبستگی ( از نوع مدل­یابی معادلات ساختاری) از نظر هدف کاربردی بود. بدین منظور تعداد 200 ورزشکار رشته های تیمی شهر تهران از بین رشته های تیمی بسکتبال، والیبال، فوتبال و هندبال به صورت داوطلبانه انتخاب و پرسشنامه های سرمایه روان شناختی لوتانز و همکاران (2007)، حس شوح طبعی و اثربخشی کارگروهی فریدمن و یاربراق (1985) را به صورت آنلاین تکمیل کردند. داده ها با استفاده از روش تحلیل مسیر و نرم افزار اسمارت پی.ال.اس تحلیل شدند.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که شوخ طبعی مربیان بر اثر بخشی کار گروهی ورزشکاران اثر مثبت دارد؛ همچنین، سرمایه روان شناختی نیز بر اثر بخشی کار گروهی ورزشکاران اثر مثبت دارد؛ در نهایت، سرمایه روان شناختی نقش میانجی و معنی داری در رابطه شوخ طبعی مربیان و اثربخشی کار گروهی ورزشکاران دارد (05/0P<).
نتیجه‌گیری: به نظر می رسد شوخ طبعی با افزایش امیدواری و سرمایه روانشناختی در ورزشکاران، اثربخشی کار گروهی را افزایش می دهد. بنابراین، مربیان با استفاده از نتایح تحقیق حاضر می توانند کار تیمی یا گروهی ورزشکاران تقویت کنند.
 
کلیدواژه‌ها
شوخ طبعی
کار گروهی
سرمایه روانشناختی
مربیان و ورزشکاران

عنوان مقاله English

Relationship between Coaches' Sense of Humor and Teamwork Effectiveness in Athletes: Mediating Role of Psychological Capital

نویسندگان English

Monir Rostam Abadi 1
Ahdiyeh Yadollazadeh 2
Galin Mahdinejad Gorji 3
Seyedeh Fatemeh Nasirkhany 4
1 PhD in Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Tabari Institute of Higher Education, Babol, Iran.
4 MS in Educational Psychology, Farvardin Institute of Higher Education, GhaemShahr, Iran.
چکیده English

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between coaches' sense of humor and the effectiveness of group work in athletes, with the mediating role of psychological capital.
Methods: This research utilized a correlational study design using structural equation modelling. A total of 200 team sport athletes from Tehran voluntarily completed the psychological capital questionnaire developed by Luthans et al. (2007), as well as the sense of humor and group work effectiveness questionnaires by Friedman and Yaarbaragh (1985). Data were analyzed using path analysis and the Smart-PLS software.
Results: The results indicated that coaches' sense of humor positively influences the effectiveness of group work in athletes. Additionally, psychological capital also has a positive impact on the effectiveness of group work in athletes. Ultimately, psychological capital plays a significant mediating role in the relationship between coaches' sense of humor and the effectiveness of group work in athletes (P< 0.05).
Conclusion: It is evident that sense of humor, by fostering hope and psychological capital in athletes, enhances the effectiveness of group work. Therefore, coaches can enhance teamwork or group work in athletes based on the findings of this study.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Humor
Teamwork
Psychological Capital
Coaches
Athletes
  1. Ashley GC, Reiter-Palmon R. Self-Awareness and the Evolution of Leaders: The Need for a Better Measure of Self-Awareness. Journal Of Behavioral & Applied Management, 2012;14(1).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/t29152-000

  1. DeChurch LA, Mesmer-Magnus JR The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010;95, 32-53.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017328

  1. Montebello AR, Buzzotta VR. Work teams that work. Training & Development, 1993; 47(3), 59-65.
  2. Behfar KJ, Peterson RS, Mannix EA, Trochim WM. The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. Journal of applied psychology, 2008;93(1), 170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.170
  3. Mogharabian M. Survey the effect of Social Determinants on work group between Women up 20 years in Tehran: The moderator role of General commitment. Quarterly Journal of Woman and Society, 2021;11(44), 237-270.
  4. Fahim Devin H, Asadollahi E. Investigating the mediating role of coaches' sense of humor in causative relation of transformational (Inspirational) Leadership with sport achievement motivation in elite athletes. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies, 2021;8(2), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.30473/fmss.2021.57959.2278
  5. Romero EJ, Cruthirds KW. The use of humor in the workplace. Academy of management perspectives, 2006;20(2), 58-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2006.261378
  6. Babylan, Z. A., Qasempour, A., & Hassanzadeh S. Investigating the mediating role of psychological stubbornness in the relationship between forgiveness and humor with hope in athletes. Journal of Motor Behavior and Sports Psychology, 2012;8(3), 130-115.
  7. Aggerholm K, Ronglan LT. Having the last laugh: The value of humour in invasion games. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 2012;6(3), 336-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2012.689321
  8. Holmes J, Marra M. Having a laugh at work: How humour contributes to workplace culture. Journal of pragmatics, 2002;34(12), 1683-1710.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00032-2

  1. Rezaei M, Nasti Zaei N. The effect of humor in the workplace on the psychological well-being of teachers with the mediation of interpersonal forgiveness. School Psychology, 2023;12(3), 62-78. https://doi.org/10.22098/jsp.2023.8131.4572
  2. Wang S. The Relationship between Psychological Contract and Work Engagement of the Post-95s: Mediation of Psychological Capital and Moderation of Organizational Commitment. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Social Science, 2024;1(1), 21-30.

https://doi.org/10.62309/mq81xp37

  1. Kumar D, Upadhyay Y, Yadav R, Goyal AK. Psychological capital and innovative work behaviour: The role of mastery orientation and creative self-efficacy. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2022;102, 103157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103157
  2. Corbu, A., Peláez Zuberbühler, M. J., & Salanova M. Positive psychology micro-coaching intervention: Effects on psychological capital and goal-related self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021;12, 566293. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.566293
  3. Aliyev R, Tunc E. Self-efficacy in counseling: The role of organizational psychological capital, job satisfaction, and burnout. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015;190, 97-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.922
  4. Kaplan M, Biçkes DM. The Relationship Between Psychological Capital and Job Satisfaction: A Study of Hotel Businesses in Nevşehir. Journal of Management & Economics/Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 2013;20(2), 233-242. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11787/2430
  5. Sullivan P. Humor styles as a predictor of satisfaction within sport teams. Humor, 2013;26(2), 343-349.
  6. Ronglan LT, Aggerholm K. ‘Humour helps’: Elite sports coaching as a balancing act. Sports Coaching Review, 2014; 3(1), 33-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2014.885776
  7. McGee E, Shevlin M. “Effect of humor on interpersonal attraction and mate selection”. The Journal of Psychology, 2009;143(1), 67-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.143.1.67-77
  8. Luthans F, Youssef CM, Avolio BJ. Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford university press. 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187526.001.0001
  9. Alipour A, Akhundi N, Sarami Forushi, GR, Arab Shibani K. Alidation and verification of factor structure of psychological asset questionnaire in Iran Khodro diesel experts. Journal of Psychological Studies, 2014;10(3), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.22051/psy.2015.1781
  10. Sadat S, Badri Gargari R. The effect of Humor Training to Teacher on Academic Burnout in Students. Positive Psychology Research, 2019;4(4), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.22108/ppls.2019.113900.1567
  11. Edwards CN, Jones RL. Humour in sports coaching:‘It’sa funny old game’. Sociological Research Online, 2018;23(4), 744-762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1360780418780047
  12. Shurcliff A. Judged humor, arousal, and the relief theory. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1968;8(4p1), 360. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025493
  13. Freud S. Original papers: humor. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1928; 9, 1-6.
  14. Paterson TA, Luthans F, Jeung, W. Thriving at work: Impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2014; 35(3), 434-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.1907
  15. Waters L, Strauss G, Somech A, Haslam N, Dussert D. Does team psychological capital predict team outcomes at work?. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2020, 10(1): 1-25.

http://dx.doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v10i1.923

  1. Walumbwa FO, Peterson SJ, Avolio BJ, Hartnell CA. An investigation of the relationships among leader and follower psychological capital, service climate, and job performance. Personnel psychology, 2010;63 (4), 937-963.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01193.x

  1. Anglin A, McKenny A, Short J. The impact of collective optimism on new venture creation and growth: A social contagion perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2018;42, 390-425. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12256
  2. Salanova M, Llorens S, Cifre E, Martínez IM. We need a hero! Toward a validation of the healthy and resilient organization (HERO) model. Group & Organization Management, 2012;37(6), 785-822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059601112470405
  3. Braithwaite V. Collective hope. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2004;592, 6-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716203262049
  4. Bar‐Tal D. Why does fear override hope in societies engulfed by intractable conflict, as it does in the Israeli society?. Political Psychology, 2001;22(3), 601-627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00255
  5. Bennett, J. B., Aden, C. A., Broome, K., Mitchell K, Rigdon WD. Team resilience for young restaurant workers: research-to-practice adaptation and assessment. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2010;15(3), 223.

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019379

  1. West BJ, Patera JL, Carsten MK. Team level positivity: Investigating positive psychological capacities and team level outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 2009; 30(2), 249-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.593
  2. Carmeli A. The relationship between emotional intelligence and work attitudes, behaviour and outcomes: An examination among senior managers. Journal of managerial Psychology, 2003;18(8), 788-813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683940310511881
  3. Ghobadi, P., Saboonchi, R., Foroghipur, H. The Relationship between Creativity, Strategic Agility, and Human Capital in the Elites of the Iranian Gymnastics Federation: More positive vision of more creative staff. Sports Psychology, 2022; 14(1): 133-146. In Persian https://doi.org/10.48308/mbsp.2021.221598.1026
روانشناسی ورزش
دوره 16، شماره 2
1403
صفحه 33-48

  • تاریخ دریافت 11 شهریور 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری 25 بهمن 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش 06 تیر 1401