Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of Sport Imagery Ability Questionnaire (SIAQ) among Athlete Students

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Sport Imagery Ability Questionnaire (SIAQ) among athlete students.
Methods: This study falls under descriptive research and is categorized as a tool validation study. The necessary information was collected cross-sectionally. The study population consisted of athlete students from Farhangian University, Payame Noor University, and Khurasgan Islamic Azad University. They were randomly selected and completed the Sport Imagery Ability Questionnaire (SIAQ), which includes 15 questions and five components: imagery skill abilit, strategy imagery ability, goal imagery ability, affect imagery ability, and mastery imagery ability. Confirmatory factor analysis assessed construct validity, Cronbach's alpha coefficient determined internal consistency, and intra-class correlation coefficient examined test-retest reliability.
Results: The results of the present study indicated a good fit for the Persian version of the Sport Imagery Ability Questionnaire (RMSEA=0.048, CFI=0.911, TLI=0.961, PNFI=0.064, AGFI=0.918). Additionally, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Sport Imagery Ability Questionnaire (SIAQ) were found to be acceptable.
Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the Persian version of the Sport Imagery Ability Questionnaire (SIAQ) demonstrates acceptable validity and reliability among athlete students. Psychologists, athletes, and researchers can utilize this questionnaire in the athlete student community.
 

Keywords

References

  1. Tahmasbi F, Hatami F, Hatami Shahmir, E. The study of psychometric Properties of Persian Version of Sport Imagery Ability Questionnaire. Sport Psychology Studies, 2022; 11(41): 43-62. In Persian 22089/spsyj.2020.7417.1792
  2. Foster DJ, Weigand DA, Baines D. The Effect of Removing Superstitious Behavior and Introducing a Pre-Performance Routine on Basketball Free-Throw Performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2006, 18(2), 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200500471343
  3. Moradi N, Fazeli D. Investigation of effect of routine introuduction, imagery and mixed methods on performance and mental representation of volleyball overhand float-serve. Journal of Sport Psychology Studies, 2017, 20; 149-68. In Persian https://doi.org/10.22089/spsyj.2017.4184.1435
  4. Velentzas K, Heinen T, Tenenbaum G, Schack T. Functional mental representation of volleyball routines in German youth female national players. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2010, 22(4), 474-485. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/10413200.2010.504650
  5. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 2001, 14(1), S103-S109. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
  6. Schack T. Measuring mental representations. Measurement in sport and exercise psychology, 2012, 8, 203-214. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.5040/9781492596332.ch-019
  7. Cumming J, Ramsey R. Sport imagery interventions. In S. Mellalieu & S. Hanton (Eds.), Advances in applied sport psychology: A review (pp. 5–36). London: Routledge. 2009.
  8. Sohrabi Dehaghani M., Khalaji H, Bahrami A. The Relationship between Mental Imagery Ability and Kinaesthesis among Athlete and Non-athlete Females. Sport Psychology Studies, 4(12), 2015, 30-16. In Persian
  9. Brown TA, Moore MT. Confirmatory factor analysis. Handbook of structural equation modeling, 2012, 361-379.
  10. Johnson The functional equivalence of imagery and movement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1982, 34(3), 349-365. 10.1080/14640748208400848
  11. Williams SE, Cumming J, Edwards M The functional equivalence between movement imagery, observation, and execution influences imagery ability. Res Q Exerc Sport, 2011, 82(3), 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599788
  12. Williams SE, Cumming Measuring athlete imagery ability: the sport imagery ability questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2011, 33, 416-440. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.33.3.416
  13. Williams SE, Cumming Athletes’ ease of imaging predicts their imagery and observational learning use. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2012, 13(4), 363-370. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.01.010
  14. Cumming J, Hall C. Athletes’ use of imagery in the off-season. The Sport Psychologist, 2002, 16, 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.16.2.160
  15. Robin N, Dominique L, Toussaint L, Blandin Y, Guillot A, Le Her M. Effect of motor imagery training on service return accuracy in tennis: The role of imagery ability. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2007, 2, 175–186. 1080/1612197X.2007.9671818
  16. Watt A, Klep D, Morris A. Psychometric analysis of the sport imagery ability measure. Journal of physical education and sport. 2018, 18 (1):138-148. 7752/jpes.2018.01018
  17. Lee SM, Horino H. Psychometric Support for a Japanese Version of the Sport Imagery Ability Questionnaire. Percept Mot Skills. 2023; 130(1):461-484.

https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125221134314

  1. Abdul Rahman AR, Hashim HA, Kuan G, Abdul Malik A. Factorial Validity and Internal Consistency of The Sports Imagery Ability Questionnaire (SIAQ) Malaysian Version. Ann Appl Sport Sci, 2022; 10 (S1):1-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.52547/aassjournal.1108
  2. Arruza Gabilondo JA, Gonzalez Rodríguez O, Cecchini Estrada JA, Fink Smith C. Validez factorial y fiabilidad de la versión española del Sport Imagery Ability Questionnaire (SIAQ). Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 2018, 18(1), 229–
  3. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3D ed.). New York:Guilford press. 2011.
  4. Sahaf R., Delbari A., Fadaye Vatan R., Rassafiani M., Sabour M., Ansari G., Shams A. Validity and Reliability of Self-Report Physical Activity Instruments for Iranian Older People. Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2014, 9 (3): 206-217. In Persian
  5. Shemshadi H, Shams A, Sahaf R, Shamsipour Dehkordi P, Zareian H, Moslem AR. (2020). Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ) Among Iranian Elderly. Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing. 15 (3) :298-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/sija.15.3.61.13
  6. Cumming J, Ste-Marie DM. The cognitive and motivational effects of imagery training: A matter of perspective. The Sport Psychologist, 2001, 15, 276–2
  7. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6, 1–55.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

  1. Gregg M, Hall C. (2006). Measurement of motivational imagery abilities in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 961–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500386167
  2. Terry PC, Lane AM, Fogarty G. Construct Validity of the Profile of Mood States-A for Use with Adults. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2003, 4, 125-39.

 10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00035-8

  1. Zaid Abadi R, Rezaei F, Motasharei E. Psychometric properties and normalization of Persian Version of Ottawa Mental Skills Assessment Tools (OMSAT-3). Sport Psychology Studies. 2014, 7: 63-82. In Persian
  2. Ramsey R, Cumming J, Edwards ME, Williams S, Brunning C. Examining the emotion aspect of PETTLEP based Imagery and penalty taking performance in football. Journal of Sport Behavior, 2010, 33, 295–315.
Sports Psychology
Volume 15, Issue 2
2023
Pages 207-220

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 22 February 2020
  • Revise Date: 12 November 2020
  • Accept Date: 15 September 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics