The review process of the articles is done confidentially and the name of authors for the reviewers and the reverse is not mentioned.
Reviewing the articles at first is conducted with respect to the standards of the journal and then is sent to the editor-in-chief.
If the article content is congruent with the journal issues of interest and if it entails innovation and practical implications for further achievement of journal’s goals, it is sent to the reviewers, otherwise, it would be rejected with non-review reasons.
Approved-by-editor articles are sent for three reviewers and reported to the editor if it is scored with two positive points.
The ultimate decision for acceptance or rejection of the article is taken by editor-in-chief and board members.
Peer Review Criteria
These criteria include relevance of the topic, authenticity and novelty, newness of the topic, documentations of the article and utilizing valid references, and significance.