Presenting a paradigm model of the development of political psychology in Iranian professional sport

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Physical Education, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: Political behavior is a significant issue worldwide that has captured the attention of researchers in this field. Political behavior encompasses activities within an organization aimed at gaining power and achieving the goals of a power seeker in situations of uncertainty or instability. This study was conducted to investigate the factors influencing the development of political psychology in Iranian professional sports.
Methods: The study utilized a qualitative approach. The statistical population consisted of knowledgeable experts, identified through purposive sampling. The sampling process continued until theoretical saturation was reached, resulting in 14 individuals being selected as participants for the qualitative section. Semi-structured interviews were used as the data collection tool.
Results: The study identified existing tensions, supportive forces, competitive environments, and mental pressures as causal conditions for the development of political psychology in Iranian professional sports. Additionally, adaptation strategies and empowerment strategies were identified as means to promote the development of political psychology in Iranian professional sports.
Conclusions: The study revealed that the development of political psychology in Iranian professional sports has consequences for both sports and politics.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Jilke S, Baekgaard M. The political psychology of citizen satisfaction: Does functional responsibility matter? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2020;30(1):130-43.
  2. Jackman S, Sniderman PM. The institutional organization of choice spaces: A political conception of political psychology. Political psychology. 2002:209-24.
  3. ShariatNia K, Motalebi M. Political psychology and entering the field of theorizing in political science. Journal of Political Studies. 2011;4(14):93-125.
  4. Beattie P. Social evolution, political psychology, and the media in democracy: The invisible hand in the US marketplace of ideas: Springer; 2019.
  5. Rabin JS. Behavioral Epigenetics: The Underpinnings of Political Psychology. The Psychology of Political Behavior in a Time of Change: Springer; 2021. 55-96.
  6. Maftouh S. Psychology of Politicians: Qoomes Publication; 2015. [In persian].
  7. Barzegar E. Political Psychology: Samt Publisher; 2014. [In persian].
  8. Fathi Ashtiani A. An Introduction to Political Psychology: Besat Publication; 2008. [In persian].
  9. Monroe KR. Political psychology: Psychology Press; 2001.
  10. Tamadoni M. Political Psychology of Contemporary Issues: Ati Publication; 2006.
  11. Petersen MB, Laustsen L. Dominant leaders and the political psychology of followership. Current opinion in psychology. 2020;33:136-41.
  12. Rajaei Dastghaieb M, KavePishghadam MK, editors. Psychology of Political Parties. First International Conference on Psychology and Educational Sciences; 2015; Shiraz. In Persian