Injuries of Organizational Anti-Citizenship Behaviors on Sports Boards Based on Bad Apple Syndrome

Document Type : علمی- پژوهشی

Authors

1 Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Professor in Sport Management, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Urmia, West Azerbaijan, Iran.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the harms of organizational anti-citizenship behaviors on sports teams based on the bad apple syndrome.
Methods: The statistical population of the study included all members of the sports boards in Lorestan province. Using Cochran's formula, a sample of 384 people was selected through random sampling. The research instrument used was a researcher-made questionnaire. The formal validity and content of the study were confirmed by surveying professors and experts (11 people), who carefully examined the literature. Additionally, other internal consistency indicators such as Composite reliability (CR), Average variance extracted (AVE), Maximum shared variance (MSV), and Average shared variance (ASV) were reviewed and confirmed. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) and inferential statistics (Pearson correlation coefficient, exploratory factor analysis, and second-order confirmatory factor analysis) were used to analyze the data.
Results: The results showed that the most important injuries caused by organizational anti-citizenship behaviors on sports boards included non-conventional conflict (0.90), distress (0.86), non-normative commitment (0.84), institutional isomorphism (0.80), lack of motivation (0.76), and damage to organizational communication (-0.06).
Conclusion: Overall, it can be concluded that most sports boards do not have a clear and effective strategy for managing the bad apple syndrome.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Alamzadeh Nouri, M. Behaviorist approach to moral development. Pegah Hozeh Magazine. 2009; 2(270): 63-71. In Persian
  2. Amir Livne G. Accounting, Valuation and Duration of Football Player Contracts. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 2005; 32(3&4): 549- 586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00604.x.
  3. Müller O, Simons A, Weinmann M. Beyond crowd judgments: Data-driven estimation of market value in association football. European Journal of Operational Research. 2017; 263: 611-624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.005.
  4. HabibiDost M, Fadavi M, Farhadi H. Identification and Pathology of Organizational Syndromes in Education. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 2021; 4(2): 127-138. 52547/ijes.4.2.127
  5. Park O, Bae J, Hong W. High-Commitment HRM System, HR Capability, and Ambidextrous Technological Innovation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2019; 30(9): 1526-1548. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1296880.
  6. Mamman A, Kamoche K, Bakuwa R. Diversity, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior: An organizing framework. Human Resource Management Review. 2012; 22(4): 285-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.12.003.
  7. Tayebi M, Ayobi F, Seyed Ameri M. The Relationship between participative management and organizational citizenship behavior. Applied research in sport management. 2013; 2, 4(8): 113-128. In Persian
  8. Dajani Zaki The Impact of Employee Engagement on Job Performance and Organizational Commitment in the Egyptian Banking Sector. Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 2015; 3(5): 138-147. 12691/jbms-3-5-1
  9. Boon C, Kalshoven K. How High-Commitment HRM Relates to Engagement and Commitment: The Moderating Role of Task Proficiency. Human Resource Management. 2014; 53(3): 403-420. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21569
  10. Kang SW, Kang SD. High-Commitment Human Resource Management and Job Stress: Supervisor Support as a Moderator. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. 2016; 44(10): 1719-1731. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.10.1719.
  11. Monnot MJ, Beehr TA. Subjective Well-Being at Work: Disentangling Source Effects of Stress and Support on Enthusiasm, Contentment, and Meaningfulness. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2014; 85(2): 204-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.07.005
  12. Mirzaei Alamooti V, Ataei M, Moghadas Z. An Explanatory Model for Individual Performance Based on a Commitment Human Resource Approach. Journal of Development & Management. 2020; 33(1): 1-26. In Persian
  13. Gholipour A, Saeidinejad M, & Zehtabi M. The Explanation of Anti-Citizenship Behaviors in the Workplaces, International Business Research. 2009; 2(4): 76-86. In Persian
  14. Tayebi M. Citizenship and anti-citizenship behaviors in sports. Tehran: Olympic Publications, First Edition; 2017. In Persian
  15. Taşkıran G. Iyigun NO. The Relationship between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Research in the Hospitality Industry. Procedia Computer Science. 2019; 158: 672-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.102
  16. Pearce CL, Giacalone RA. Teams Behaving Badly: Factors Associated With Anti-Citizenship Behavior in Teams. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2003;33(1):58-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02073.x.
  17. Helmi Sh. The Evaluation of the Relationship between EQ Factors of Employees and Anti-Citizenship Organizational Behavior. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences. 2015; 4(1): 2104-2116.
  18. Barahooyi SA, Nastiezaie N. The effect of work alienation on incidents organizational anti-citizenship behaviors through the mediating role of job burnout (Case study: principals of Zahedan high schools). Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology. 2019; 20(3): 77-90. In Persian 30486/jsrp.2019.582782.1645
  19. Li S, Chen Y. The Relationship between Psychological Contract Breach and Employees' Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Effect of Organizational Cynicism and Work Alienation. Frontiers in psychology. 2018; 27(9):1273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01273
  20. Dargi P. Diagnosing Organization Disorders and Syndromes: Strategies and Treatments. First Edition, Tehran: Marketing Publications; 2020. In Persian
  21. Moreau KA, Eady K. The benefits and challenges of involving adolescents in medical education: A qualitative study. Academic Pediatrics. 2019; 19(1): 97-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2018.05.007.
  22. Shin, H. W., Picken, C. J., Dess, G. G. Revisiting the learning organization: How to create it. Organizational Dynamics. 2017; 46(1): 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2016.10.009.
  23. Liu XL, Lu JG, Zhang H, Cai Y. Helping the organization but hurting yourself: How employees’ unethical pro-organizational behavior predicts work-to-life conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2021, 167: 88-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.05.002
  24. Tayebi M, Naderian Jahromi, M. Analysis of Social and Organizational Consequences of Inappropriate use of Specialists in Sports Board. Journal of Human Resource Management in Sport, 2019; 6(2): 277-295. In Persian10. 22044/shm.2019.7899.1890
  25. Vakili MM. Assessment of construct validity questionnaires in psychological and educational research: Applications, Methods, and Interpretation of Exploratory factor analysis. J Med Educ Dev. 2018; 11(30): 4-19. In Persian
  26. Raminmehr H, Charsetad P. Quantitative Research Method Using structural Equation Modeling (Lisrel Software). Tehran: Termeh publishing; 2017. In Persian
  27. Robbins SP. Organization Theory: Structure, design and application. Translate by: Alvani, S. M. & Danaee Fard, H. 3th Tehran: Saffar Publication; 2012. In Persian
  28. Robbins SP. Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies & Applications. Translate by: Parsayan, A & A’arabi, S. M. vol 2. Seventh & eight edition. Tehran: Cultural Research Bureau. Eleventh edition; 2007. In Persian
  29. Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., de Vet, H. C., & van der Beek, A. J. Measuring Individual Work Performance: Identifying and Selecting Indicators. Work. 2014; 48(2): 229-238. 3233/WOR-131659.
  30. Kondo H, Tsuda K, Kino Y. Analysis of recognition of inter-organizational conflict and actions to address it using dependency expressions. Procedia Computer Science. 2021; 192: 1713-1719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.176.
  31. Besharat MA, Ghahramani MH. Predicting sport achievement in contact and noncontact sports in terms of sport stress coping styles. Sport Psychology. 2016. 1(2): 97-106. In Persian
  32. Safarzadeh H, Mansori S. Management Theories, Volume II (Organizational Behavior, Organizational Resources), 3th Edition, Tehran: Pouran Pajouhesh Publications; 2011. In Persian
  33. Gholipour A. Human Resource Managenent: (Concept, Theories and Application). Tehran: SAMT Publication. 2th edition; 2012. In Persian
  34. Pasand F, Bahramian M, Khormaei F. Prediction of Stress-Copying Styles Based on the Big five Personality Factors in Endurance Runners. Sport Psychology. 2016. 1(1): 3-10. In Persian
  35. Frimanson L, Hornbach J, Hartmann F. Performance evaluations and stress: Field evidence of the hormonal effects of evaluation frequency. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2021, 95: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101279
  36. McLarty BD, Muldoon J, Quade M, King A. Your boss is the problem and solution: How supervisor-induced hindrance stressors and LMX influence employee job neglect and subsequent performance. Journal of Business Research. 2021; 130: 308-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.032
  37. Cavanaugh WR, Boswell WR, Roehling MV, John WB. An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2000; 85: 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65.
  38. Rahman Seresht H. Theories of Organization and Management from Modernism to Postmodernism Volume 2, Eighth Edition, Tehran: Doran Publications; 2017. In Persian
  39. Ansari ME, Dehghani Anari F, SHahbazi GH. Relationship between health motivational factors and job dissatisfaction and satisfaction using Herzberg’s theory (case study: Police employment of Isfahan). Police Management Studies Quarterly (PMSQ). 2012; 7(2): 178- 196. In Persian
  40. IranNejad Parizi M. Fundamentals of Management (In the age Information): Concepts, theories and application. Tehran: Management publication; 2014. In Persian
  41. Rotundo M, Sackett PR. The Relative Importance of Task, Citizenship, and Counterproductive Performance to Global Ratings of Job Performance: A Policy-Capturing Approach. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002; 87(1): 66-80.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.66

  1. Lussier RN, Hendon JR. Human Resource Management: Functions, Applications, and Skill Development: Sage Publications; 2017.
  2. Haines VY, St-Onge S. Performance Management Effectiveness: Practices or Context? The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2012, 23(6): 1158-1175.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.561230.

  1. Ferine KF, Aditia R, Fitri Rahmadana M. Indri An empirical study of leadership, organizational culture, conflict, and work ethic in determining work performance in Indonesia's education authority. Heliyon. 2021; 7: 1-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07698

Sports Psychology
Volume 15, Issue 2
2023
Pages 53-70

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 31 October 2021
  • Revise Date: 15 February 2022
  • Accept Date: 17 March 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics