The difference between the process of learning anti-phase movements in hand and leg within a training span

Document Type : علمی- پژوهشی

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, AlMahdi Mehr Higher Education Institute, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch of Tehran.

3 Emam Hossein University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of the following research was the difference between the process of learning anti-phase movements in hand and leg within a training span. Methods: 12 female students of the Farhangian University of Isfahan (22±5), with no background in rhythmic activities in any sports field were randomly classified and they were trined in a six months period under the supervision of hip-hop trainer, considering research assigments, they all practiced and lerned the task. During the six months all participants in the distance of one, tere and six months were present at the laboratory. Any time using the motion analyzer, seven cameras with the frequency of 60 in 3D, the implementation of physical exersises were filmed. Specified data were processed and the participant's performance variable errors were calculated whit the assistance of matlab software. Then by appliying ANOVA, repeated measures in the level of (P= 0.005) were analyzed. Results: findings indicate, any the main effect of the limbs was significant, the main effect of the levels and reflection effect of the levels and limbs were non statisticaly significant. Conclusion: results indicate, exercise improves the anti-phase movements, how ever emprovement in performing anti-phase movements due to exersice in a specified duration, were more in hands than in legs.

Keywords

References

  1. اشمیت، ریچارد ای و لی، تیموتی دیی (1387). یادگیری و کنترل حرکتی. ترجمة رسول حمایت‌طلب و عبدالله قاسمی؛ چاپ اول، انتشارات علم و حرکت.
  2. آرازشی، نگار؛ مختاری، پونه و واعظ موسوی، محمد کاظم (1391). تأثیر سطح تبحر ورزشکاران برثبات حرکات هماهنگ درون‌مرحله و برون‌مرحله. رفتار حرکتی و روان شناسی ورزشی. شماره 10، بهار و تابستان 1391، 77ـ90.
  3. عابدان زاده، رسول و عبدلی، بهروز و فارسی، علیرضا (1394). تاثیر بازخورد حسی بر انتقال فاز نسبی در تکلیف هماهنگی دو دستی سالمندان. پژوهش در علوم توانبخشی. فروردین و اردیبهشت، 1، 61-74.
  4. کریس ای. بِرگ، ریچارد دبیلیو. لاتین (2008). روش های تحقیق در تندرستی، تربیت بدنی، علوم ورزشی و تفریحات، ترجمه بهروز عبدلی، نصور احمدی، الهام عظیم زاده؛ (1389)، انتشارات علم و حرکت.
  5. لئونارد، چارلز (1384). عصب شناسی حرکات انسان، ترجمة پونه مختاری؛چاپ اول، انتشارات دانشگاه امام حسین.
  6. مگیل، ریچارد ای (1386). یادگیری حرکتی مفاهیم و کاربردها. ترجمة سید محمد کاظم واعظ موسوی و معصومه شجاعی؛ چاپ اول، انتشارات بامداد کتاب.
  7. Beek P J, Peper C E, & Stegeman D F. Dynamical models of movement coordination. Human Movement Science. 1995. 14, 573–628.
  8. Bingham, G. P., Schmidt, R. C., & Zaal, F. T. J. M. (1999).Visual perception of relative phasing of human limb movements. Perception & Psychophysics,61,246–258.
  9. Charles H. Shea. John J. Buchanan. Deanna M. Kennedy..Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination. 2015. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. vol: 10.3758/s13423-015-0915-3
  10. Charles H. Shea. John J. Buchanan. Deanna M. Kennedy..Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination. 2015. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. vol: 10.3758/s13423-015-0915-3
  11. Daniel J. Goble, James P. Coxon, Annouchka Van Impe, Jeroen De Vos, Nicole Wenderoth, and Stephan P. Swinnen. The Neural Control of Bimanual Movements in the Elderly: Brain Regions Exhibiting Age-Related Increases in Activity, Frequency-Induced Neural Modulation, and Task-Specific Compensatory Recruitment. Human Brain Mapping. 2010. 31:1281–1295.
  12. Dessing J C, Daffertshofer A, Peper C E, & Beek P J. Pattern Stability and Error Correction During In-Phase and Antiphase Four-Ball Juggling. Motor Behavior. 2007. 39 (5): 433–446.
  13. Diedrich FJ, Warren WH Jr. Why change gaits? Dynamics of the walk-run transition. experimental psychology. human perception. 1995. Feb;21(1):183-202.
  14. Franz E A. Bimanual action representation: A window on human evolution. Cognitive neuroscience. 2003. p.259-288.
  15. Kelso J A S, Schöner G. Self-organization of coordinative movement patterns. Human Movement Science. 1988. 7: 27-46.
  16. Kim Y. Effect of practice on pattern changes: roundhous kick in taekwondo. Unpublished Master thesis, Colledge of Health and Human Sciences, Texas. USA. 2002.
  17. Leonard Charles T. the neuroscience of human movement. 1thed. Tehran. IL: emam hosein university. 2005. P. 205-215. in Persian.
  18. Liuzzi G, Ho¨rniß V, Zimerman M, Gerloff Ch, Friedhelm C. Hummel. Coordination of Uncoupled Bimanual Movements by Strictly Timed Interhemispheric Connectivity. The Journal of Neuroscience, June 22, 2011. 31(25):9111–9117.
  19. Magill RA. Motor Learning: concepts and applications. Mohammad kazem vaez mosavi. Masume shojaei. 1thed. Tehran. LI: bamdad ketab. P: 63, 229. in persian.
  20. Morton M. Lang CE . Inter- intralimb generalization of adaptation during catching. Exp Brain research. 2001: 141: 438- 45.
  21. Rosenbaum D A, Dawson AM, & Challis JH. Haptic Tracking Permits Bimanual Independence. Experimental Psycholog. 2006. 32(5): 1266–1275.
  22. Rosenbaum David A.human Motor Control. 1thed. London. IL:academic press; 1991.
  23. Salter J, wishart L, Lee T, simonD. Perceptual and motor contributions to bimanual coordination.Neuroscilett. 2004;363:102-107.
  24. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. 4thed. Champaign. IL: Human Kinetic; 2005.
  25. Swinnen S P, & Wenderoth N. Two hands, one brain: cognitive neuroscience of bimanual skill. TRENDS in Cognitive Scien. 2000. 4ces Vol.8 (1): 18- 25.
  26. Tao Wu, Liang Wang, Mark Hallett, Kuncheng Li, Piu Chan .Neural correlates of bimanual anti-phase and in-phase movements in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology. 2010. 133; 2394–2409.
  27. Temprado J J, Swinnen SP. Dynamics of learning and transfer of muscular and spatial relative phase in bimanual coordination: evidence for abstract directional.codes. Exp Brain Res. 2005. vol 160, p: 180–188.
  28. Temprado J J, Swinnen SP. Dynamics of learning and transfer of muscular and spatial relative phase in bimanual coordination: evidence for abstract directional.codes. Exp Brain Res. 2005. vol 160, p: 180–188.
  29. Vangheluwe S, Suy E, Wenderoth N, Swinnen S P. Learning and Transfer of an Ipsilateral Coordination Task: Evidence for a Dual-layer Movement Representation. cognitive neuroscience. 2005. vol, 16. p: 1460-1470.
  30. Wenderoth N. Puttemans V. Vangheluwe S. Swinnen S P. Bimanual training reduces spatial interference. Motor Behavior. 2003. 35, 296-306.
  31. Yen-Hsun Wu. Latash M l. The Effects of Practice on Coordination. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2014. 42(1): 37–42.
  32. Zelic G, Mottet J. Lagarde J. Audio-tactile events can improve the interlimb coordination in juggling. Bio Web of Conferences. 2011.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 28 June 2016
  • Revise Date: 10 February 2021
  • Accept Date: 31 December 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics