Effects of normative feedback on learning volleyball serves, vitality during exercise and interest to continue sports participation

Document Type : علمی- پژوهشی

Authors

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan)

Abstract

This study examined the effects of normative feedback on learning volleyball serves, vitality and interest to continue sports participation. 45 students of University with age range of 18-21 years, who were amateur volleyball players, were selected randomly and assigned into 3 groups: positive normative feedback, negative normative feedback and control group. The task of the participation was simple volleyball service.
During the acquisition phase the participations performed 120 volleyball serving drills in form of 12 ten-trial block in 4 sessions. Any of the three groups became aware of their scores average after each block. Both of the positive and negative normative feedback groups became aware of their scores average and also they were falsely reported about the scores average of the group.
Retention test was carried out 10 days later. This test included 10 trials without any feedback. Before and after the acquisition phase, the participation completed the questionnaire of vitality and interest in sports participation. Analysis of variance with repeated measures, one-way analysis of variance and co-variance were used for data analysis. In the acquisition phase and retention test, the scores of negative normative feedback group was lower than control group; however, no significant difference was observed between positive normative feedback group and control group.
Also in comparison with control group, the negative normative feedback group had lower interest to continue sports participation; however, there was no significant difference between positive normative feedback group and control group regarding interest in sports participation. Vitality of positive normative feedback group and negative normative feedback group were estimated higher and lower than the control group, respectively. The findings of the study showed that the coach’s feedback can influence vitality, learning and interest to continue sports participation. So, the coaches are recommended to pay enough attention to use augmented normative feedback.

Keywords

References

  1. آقاقزوینی ش، بادامی ر، تقیان ف. 1394. اثر ورزش در آب بر خشنودی از نیازهای روانی پایه، انگیزش درونی و علاقه به تداوم مشارکت ورزشی زنان چاق: مطالعة نظریة خودمختاری، نشریه مطالعات روانشناسی ورزشی، 13، 23-38.
  2. اسلامی نصرت آبادی م، نزاکت الحسینی م، رهاوی ر. 1392. اثر بازخورد دقیق، غیر دقیق و هنجاری بر یادگیری یک تکلیف زمان بندی متوالی. پایان نامة کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه خوراسگان.
  3. اشمیت ر ای، ریسبرگ ک ای. 2004. یادگیری و عملکرد حرکتی رویکرد یادگیری مساله مدار. ترجمۀ نمازی زاده م، واعظ موسوی م ک. 1389. تهران انتشارات سمت، چاپ اول.
  4. ریو ج م. 1992. انگیزش و هیجان. ترجمۀ محمدی ی. 1376. تهران: نشر ویرایش.
  5. عریضی ح، عابدی ا، تاجی م. 1386. رابطۀ رفتارهای معلم با سرزندگی و انگیزش درونی دانش آموزان دبیرستان های شهر اصفهان. فصلنامة نوآوری های آموزشی، شماره 23.
  6. واعظ موسوی م ک، مسیبی ف. 1386. روان شناسی ورزش. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
  7. Badami R, VaezMousavi M, Namazizadeh M, Wulf G. 2011. Feedback after good trials enhances intrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82,2: 360-364.
  8. Badhwar N K. 2009. The Milgram Experiments, Learned Helplessness, and Character Traits. J Ethics, 13:257-289.
  9. Bandura A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  10. Bandura A. 1986. Social Foundation of Thouth and Actions: A Social cognitive theory Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  11. Bostic J H. .2003.Constructive thinking, mental health and physical health.Ph.D. dissertation, Saint Louis University
  12. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. 2007. Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78, 40-47.Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. 2005. Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 42-48.
  13. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. 2005. Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 42-48.
  14. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. 2002). Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73,408-415.
  15. Eliot A J, Moller A C. 2003. Performance-approach goals: Good or bad forms of governing complex decision making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford.
  16. Gelbrich K. 2010. Anger, frustration,and helplessness after service failure: coping strategies and effective informational support. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci, 38:567-585.
  17. Harter S.1998. Development processes in the construction or the self. In T. D. Yawkey & J. E.
  18. Hutchinson J C. Sherman T. Martinovic N. Tenenbaum G. 2008. The effect of manipulated self-ef fi cacy on perceived and sustained effort. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 20,457 -472 .
  19. Lewthwaite R, Wulf G. 2010. Social-comprative feedback motor skill learning. Quartery Journal of Exprimental Psychology, 63, 738-749.
  20. Luciana TG, CHiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Lewthwaite. R. 2012. Positive social-comparative feedback enhance motor learning in children . Psychologiy of sport and exercise, 849-853.
  21. Mikulincer M. Caspy T. 1986. The conceptualization of helpless: laboratory correlates of the phenomenological definition of helplessness. Motivation and Emotion, V.10, NO.3.
  22. Nicaise V, Bois J E, Fairclough S J, Amorose A J, Cogerino G. 2007. Girls and boys participation of physical education teachers feedback: Effect on performance and psychological responses. Journal of sports Sciences, 25(8), 915-926.
  23. Song L, Che W, Min-wei W, Murakami Y,Matsumoto k. 2006. Impairment of the spatial learning and memory induced by learned helplessness and chronic mild stress Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 83. 186-193.
  24. Wulf G, CHiviacowsky S, Lewthwaite R. 2010. Normative feedback effects on learning a timing task: Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 4: 425-431.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 15 March 2016
  • Revise Date: 10 February 2021
  • Accept Date: 31 December 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics