the effect of practice organization on childrens foot motor asymmetry in soccer shot

Document Type : علمی - ترویجی

Abstract

Because of the importance of motor asymmetry in the implementation of skills like soccer shot with bothsides of the bodyare applicabletraining sessionsshouldbe designedto reducethe asymmetry inbilateralmotorskills. Hence, the present study aimed to determine the effect of practice organization on motor asymmetric of soccer shot skill in children 7-10 yr.Therefore, 50 male with mean age ±10.1 years from 3 soccer schools (5 left footed and 45 right footed) were selected by random cluster sampling method and randomly divided into dominant-nondominant blocked, nondominant-dominant blocked, serial, increasing practice, and control groups. The Coren's footedness test, theAmirfakhrian’s pattern evlaluation scale, and Moore-Christine shot test (modified for children) were used to determinethe dominant leg, evalutat shot pattern, and shot accuracy, respectively.Thetests were performedin 3 phases (pretest, retention, and transfertests). Results of ANCOVA indicated that in the retention and transfer tests, motor asymmetry indices in shot accuracy of control and increasing groups were the most and least values, respectively. On the other hand, motor asymmetry indices in shot pattern of increasing and nondominant-dominant foot groups were the least and most values, respectively, in retention test, but in transfer test, there was no significant between groups difference this index. Thus, it is recommended the practice with increasing the level of contextual interference for coaches to reduce motor asymmetry in feet for soccer shot

Keywords


  1. Teixeira, L.A., M.V. Silva, and M. Carvalho, 2003.Reduction of lateral asymmetries in
  2. dribbling: The role of bilateral practice. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition,.
  3. (1): p. 53-65.
  4. Watson, G.S, 1998.Handedness, footedness, and language laterality: Evidence from Wada
  5. testing. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 3(4): p. 323-330.
  6. Gabbard, C.P., Lifelong motor development. 6 ed. 2012, New York: Pearson.
  7. Sommer, M., 2006. Bilaterality in sports–an explorative study of soccer and ice-hockey players. Umeå:
  8. Department of Psychology at Umeå University
  9. Chapman, J.P., L.J. Chapman, and J.J. Allen, 1987. The measurement of foot preference.
  10. Neuropsychologia, 25(3): p. 579-584.
  11. Gabbard, C. and S. Hart, 1996. A question of foot dominance. The Journal of general
  12. psychology, 123(4): p. 289-296.
  13. Peters, M., 1988.Footedness: asymmetries in foot preference and skill and neuropsychological
  14. assessment of foot movement. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2): p. 179.
  15. Elias, L.J., M.P. Bryden, and M.B. Bulman-Fleming, 1998. Footedness is a better predictor than
  16. is handedness of emotional lateralization. Neuropsychologia, 36(1): p. 37-43.
  17. Goodwin, J. E. & Meeuwsen, H. J. (1996) Investigation of the contextual interference effect in
  18. the manipulation of the motor parameter of over-all force. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83(3),735-
  19. Magil, Richard A,2011. Motor learning : concept and applications. New York: Mc Graw_Hill
  20. Hwang, G.Y. (2003) ‘ An Examination Of The Impact Of Introducing Greater Contextual
  21. Interference During Practice On Learning To Golf Putt, Thesis For The Degree Of Doctor Of
  22. Education
  23. Magill, R.A. and K.G. Hall, 1990.A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition.
  24. Human movement science,. 9(3): p. 241-289.
  25. ١٧
  26. Feghhi, I. and R. Valizade, 2011. Systematically Increasing Contextual Interference is Beneficial
  27. For Learning Single Task. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30: p. 2191-2193.
  28. .امیرفخریان،معصومه.( 1390 ). مقایسه اثرکانون توجه با آرایش ثابت، متغیر دسته ای و تصادفی براجرا و یادگیری شوت فوتبال در کودکان
  29. مبتدی، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد.دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرج.
  30. Rodrigues, P.C., 2009. Functional asymmetry in a simple coincidence-anticipation task: Effects of
  31. handedness. European Journal of Sport Science, 9(2): p. 115-123.55. Sadeghi, H., 2000. Symmetry
  32. and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: a review.Gait & posture, 12(1): p. 34-45.
  33. Jeffreys, I., 2006. Motor Learning---Applications for Agility, Part 1. Strength & Conditioning
  34. Journal, 28(5): p. 72-76.
  35. Porter, J.M ., Landin, D., Hebert, Edward, p ., Baum, B. ( 2007) . The effects of three levels of
  36. contextual interference on performance outcomes and movement patterns in Golf skills.
  37. International journal of sports science & Coaching, 2 (3), pp. 243-255 ( 13 )
  38. Porter, J.M., & magill, R.A. (2008). Systematically increasing contextual interference during
  39. practice is beneficial for learning novel motor skills. Dissertation, Reasearch quarterly for
  40. exercise and sport. Title page for ETD ets-04042008-112837.
  41. Porter, J.M. and R.A. Magill, 2010.Systematically increasing contextual interference is beneficial
  42. for learning sport skills. Journal of sports sciences, 28(12): p. 1277-1285.
  43. .رمضان زاده،حسام( 1390 ). مقایسه تاثیر تداخل زمینه ای اافزایشی و کاهنده با تغییر برنامه حرکتی و پارامتر بر یادگیری
  44. تکلیف زمان بندی پیش بینی انطباقی و قابلیت شناسایی خطا پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد.دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
  45. . Guadagnoli, M.A. and T.D. Lee, 2004. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of
  46. various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of motor behavior, 36(2): p. 212-224.
  47. Mazzardo O. J.( 2004) ‘Contextual Interference: Is It Supported Across Studies? Thesis for the
  48. degree of Master of Science Health, Physical, Recreation and Education.
  49. ١٨
  50. Grouios, G., 2009. Investigating the stabilising and mobilising features of footedness. Laterality,
  51. (4): p. 362-380
  52. Annett, M., Handedness and brain asymmetry: The right shift theory.: Psychology Press.
  53. Grouios, G., 2004.MOTORIC DOMINANCE AND SPORTING EXCELLENCE: TRAINING
  54. VERSUS HEREDITY 1. Perceptual and motor skills, 98(1): p. 53-66.
  55. Stöckel, T. and M. Weigelt, 2012. Plasticity of human handedness: Decreased one-hand bias and
  56. inter-manual performance asymmetry in expert basketball players. Journal of sports sciences,
  57. (10): p. 1037-1045.