نقش میانجی گر حمایت اجتماعی ادراک شده در پیش بینی انگیزش شرط بندی فوتبال بر اساس نگرش و تکانشگری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مدیریت ورزشی- دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی- دانشگاه رازی کرمانشاه-کرمانشاه- ایران

2 گروه مدیریت ورزشی- دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی- دانشگاه رازی،کرمانشاه، ایران

3 گروه رفتار حرکتی و مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

4 گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی نقش میانجی گر حمایت اجتماعی ادراک شده در پیش بینی انگیزش شرط بندی فوتبال بر اساس نگرش و تکانشگری انجام شد.

روش: پژوهش حاضر همبستگی از نوع مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل تمامی افرادی بود که در شرط بندی فوتبال شرکت داشتند. تعداد 400 نفر از کسانی که در یک سال گذشته در شرط بندی فوتبال شرکت داشته اند به شیوه نمونه گیری در دسترس به عنوان نمونه پژوهش انتخاب شدند. از پرسشنامه های انگیزه شرط بندی، نگرش شرط بندی، تکانشگری و حمایت اجتماعی ادارک شده استفاده شد. داده ها با استفاده از روش آمار توصیفی و تحلیل معادلات ساختاری با استفاده از نرم افزار AMOS نسخه24 و SPSS نسخه 26 مورد تجزیه تحلیل قرار گرفتند.

یافته ها: تکانشگری و نگرش به ترتیب با ضریب مسیر 30/0 و 41/0 ارتباط مثبت و معنی داری با انگیزش شرط بندی داشتند. حمایت اجتماعی ادراک شده ارتباط منفی و معنی داری (45/0-=β) با انگیزش داشتند. به علاوه نقش حمایت اجتماعی به عنوان میانجی در ارتباط بین تکانشگری و انگیزش معنی دار (20/0-=β) بود. همچنین نگرش به شرط بندی و تکانشگری ارتباط مثبت و معنی داری (36/0=β) را نشان دادند.

نتیجه گیری: حمایت اجتماعی ادراک شده می تواند عاملی کارآمد در کاهش سطح گرایش به شرط بندی و همچنین تعدیل کننده تکانشگری داشته باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Mediating Role of Perceived Social Support in Predicting Motivation for Football Betting Based on Attitude and Impulsivity

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Seifourian 1
  • Keyvan Shabani Moghadam 2
  • Mir Hasan Seyyed Ameri 3
  • Aboualfazl Farahani 4
1 Department of sport management, Physical education and sport sciences faculty, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 Department of sport management, Physical education and sport sciences faculty, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
3 Department of Motor Behavior and Sport Managment, Faculty of physical education and sport sciences, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
4 Department of sport management, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Purpose: This study aims to investigate how perceived social support plays a role in predicting motivation for football betting based on attitude and impulsivity.
Methods: Structural equation modelling was used to analyse the relationships. The study population consisted of individuals who engaged in football betting. A sample of 400 individuals who had participated in football betting in the previous year was chosen through convenience sampling. Questionnaires on Betting Motivation, Betting Attitude, Impulsivity, and Perceived Social Support were distributed. Data analysis was carried out using descriptive statistics and structural equation modelling with SPSS 26 and Amos 24 software.
Results: Impulsivity and attitude were found to have a direct and significant impact on betting motivation. Perceived social support was negatively and significantly correlated (β = -0.45) with motivation. Moreover, social support played a significant mediating role (β = -0.20) in the relationship between impulsivity and motivation. Additionally, attitudes towards betting and impulsivity exhibited a positive and significant relationship (β = 0.36).
Conclusion: Perceived social support can serve as a valuable factor in reducing the tendency to bet impulsively.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Motivation
  • Attitude
  • Impulsivity
  • Social Support
  • Betting
  • Football

مراجع

  1. Chehabi HE. The Politics of Football in Iran. Soccer & Society. 2006;7(2-3):233-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970600615328
  2. Pradier P-C. Historical Perspectives on Sports Economics. Betting on sport: history, regulation, measurement: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2019, 150-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781788977845.00018
  3. Dietl H, Weingaertner C. Betting scandals and attenuated property rights - How betting related match fixing can be prevented in future. University of Zurich, Institute for Strategy and Business Economics (ISU); 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2483058
  4. Delfabbro P, King, D. L., & Derevensky, J. L. . Adolescent gambling and problem gambling: Prevalence, current issues, and concerns. Current Addiction Reports. 2016, 3, 268–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40429-016-0105-z
  5. Guillou Landreat M, Chereau Boudet I, Perrot B, Romo L, Codina I, Magalon D, et al. Problem and non-problem gamblers: a cross-sectional clustering study by gambling characteristics. BMJ Open. 2020;10(2):e030424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030424
  6. Lee C-K, Chung N, Bernhard BJ. Examining the structural relationships among gambling motivation, passion, and consequences of internet sports betting. Journal of gambling studies. 2014;30(4):845-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9400-y
  7. Gordon R, Gurrieri L, Chapman M. Broadening an understanding of problem gambling: The lifestyle consumption community of sports betting. Journal of Business Research. 2015;68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.016
  8. Killick E, Griffiths M. Why Do Individuals Engage in In-Play Sports Betting? A Qualitative Interview Study. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2021;37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-020-09968-9
  9. Gökce Yüce S, Yüce A, Katırcı H, Nogueira-López A, González-Hernández J. Effects of Sports Betting Motivations on Sports Betting Addiction in a Turkish Sample. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11469-021-00563-6
  10. Ayandele O, Popoola O, Obosi AC. Influence of Demographic and Psychological Factors on Attitudes Toward Sport Betting Among Young Adults in Southwest Nigeria. J Gambl Stud. 2020;36(1):343-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-019-09882-9
  11. Ucheagwu V, Okoli P, Ossai N. Some Neuropsychological Profiles and Personality Traits of Undergraduate Regular Online Football Gamblers (a New Online Gambling Game) in Nigeria. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2019;35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-018-9812-9
  12. Seal E, Cardak BA, Nicholson M, Donaldson A, O'Halloran P, Randle E, et al. The Gambling Behaviour and Attitudes to Sports Betting of Sports Fans. J Gambl Stud. 2022: 1-33.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-021-10101-7

  1. McAllister I. Public opinion towards gambling and gambling regulation in Australia. International Gambling Studies. 2014;14(1):146-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2013.861001
  2. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1980;278.
  3. Kallick M, Suits D, Dielman T, Hybels J. A Survey of Gambling Attitudes and Behavior. Ann Arbor. 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/icpsr07495.v1
  4. Breen RB, Zuckerman M. 'Chasing' in gambling behavior: Personality and cognitive determinants. Personality and Individual Differences. 1999;27(6):1097-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00052-5
  5. Alessi SM, Petry NM. Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure. Behav Processes. 2003;64(3):345-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0376-6357(03)00150-5
  6. Barratt ES, Patton J, Greger Olsson N, Zuker G. Impulsivity and Paced Tapping. Journal of Motor Behavior. 1981;13(4):286-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1981.10735254
  7. Choi J, Kim K. The Relationship between Impulsiveness, Self-Esteem, Irrational Gambling Belief and Problem Gambling Moderating Effects of Gender. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(10):5180. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5180#
  8. Nigg JT. Annual Research Review: On the relations among self-regulation, self-control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk-taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017;58(4):361-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12675
  9. Hook RW, Grant JE, Ioannidis K, Tiego J, Yücel M, Wilkinson P, et al. Trans-diagnostic measurement of impulsivity and compulsivity: A review of self-report tools. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;120:455-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.007
  10. Kavyani M, Farsi A, kavyani A, Moradi M. Testing the model of individual interpersonal cognitive and social factors affecting sports participation: Cognitive-social model of sports participation. Sports Psychology. 2020; 5(1):67-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/mbsp.5.1.67
  11. Kim SBJ, J.I. A Study on the Discriminating Factors of Adolescents' Gambling Addiction: Focusing on Irrational Belief of Gambling, Impulsiveness, and Smartphone Addiction. Journal of the Korea Academia Industrial Cooperation Society. 2016;17:630-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/kais.2016.17.8.630
  12. Kecojevic A, Basch C, Kernan W, Montalvo Y, Lankenau S. Perceived Social Support, Problematic Drug Use Behaviors, and Depression Among Prescription Drugs-Misusing Young Men Journal of Drug Issues. 2019;49:002204261982924. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022042619829246
  13. Lai CC, Ma CM. The mediating role of social support in the relationship between psychological well-being and health-risk behaviors among Chinese university students. Health Psychol Open. 2016;3(2):2055102916678106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055102916678106
  14. Kapetanovic S, Skoog T, Gerdner A, Bohlin M. Aspects of the Parent–Adolescent Relationship and Associations With Adolescent Risk Behaviors Over Time. Journal of Family Psychology. 2018;33. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000436
  15. Grall-Bronnec M, Wainstein L, Feuillet F, Bouju G, Rocher B, Vénisse JL, et al. Clinical profiles as a function of level and type of impulsivity in a sample group of at-risk and pathological gamblers seeking treatment. J Gambl Stud. 2012;28(2):239-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-011-9258-9
  16. Ginley MK, Whelan JP, Meyers AW, Relyea GE, Pearlson GD. Exploring a multidimensional approach to impulsivity in predicting college student gambling. Journal of gambling studies. 2014;30(2):521-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9374-9
  17. Billieux J, Lagrange G, Van der Linden M, Lançon C, Adida M, Jeanningros R. Investigation of impulsivity in a sample of treatment-seeking pathological gamblers: a multidimensional perspective. Psychiatry Res. 2012;198(2):291-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2012.01.001
  18. Farhat LC, Wampler J, Steinberg MA, Krishnan-Sarin S, Hoff RA, Potenza MN. Excitement-Seeking Gambling in Adolescents: Health Correlates and Gambling-Related Attitudes and Behaviors. J Gambl Stud. 2021;37(1):43-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-020-09960-3
  19. Cooper A, Olfert K, Marmurek HHC. Predictors of Problem Gambling for Sports and Non-sports Gamblers: A Stochastic Search Variable Selection Analysis. J Gambl Stud. 2021.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-021-10025-2

  1. Binde P. Exploring the impact of gambling advertising: An interview study of problem gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2009;7(4):541-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11469-008-9186-9
  2. Griffiths M. Adolescent Gambling. 32011. p. 11-20.
  3. McCormack A, Griffiths MD. Motivating and inhibiting factors in online gambling behaviour: A grounded theory study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2012;10(1):39-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11469-010-9300-7
  4. Westberg K, Beverland MB, Thomas SL. The Unintended Normalization of Gambling: Family Identity Influences on the Adoption of Harmful Consumption Practices. Journal of Macromarketing. 2017;37(4):426-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0276146717720979
  5. Cohen S, Wills T. Stress, Social Support, and the Buffering Hypothesis. Psychological bulletin. 1985;98:310-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.98.2.310
  6. Rees T, & Hardy, L. An Investigation of the Social Support Experiences of High-Level Sports Performers. The Sport Psychologist. 2000;14:327-47.
  7. Cheng Y, Li X, Lou C, Sonenstein FL, Kalamar A, Jejeebhoy S, et al. The association between social support and mental health among vulnerable adolescents in five cities: findings from the study of the well-being of adolescents in vulnerable environments. J Adolesc Health. 2014;55(6 Suppl):S31-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.08.020
  8. Sharman S, Clark L, Roberts A, Michalczuk R, Cocks R, Bowden-Jones H. Heterogeneity in Disordered Gambling: Decision-Making and Impulsivity in Gamblers Grouped by Preferred Form. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:588. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00588
  9. Lutri V, Soldini E, Ronzitti S, Smith N, Clerici M, Blaszczynski A, et al. Impulsivity and Gambling Type Among Treatment-Seeking Disordered Gamblers: An Explorative Study. J Gambl Stud. 2018;34(4):1341-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-018-9764-0
  10. Granero R, Fernández-Aranda F, Valero-Solís S, Pino-Gutiérrez AD, Mestre-Bach G, Baenas I, et al. The influence of chronological age on cognitive biases and impulsivity levels in male patients with gambling disorder. J Behav Addict. 2020;9(2):383-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00028
  11. Zhang Y, Liu Z, Zhao Y. Impulsivity, Social Support and Depression Are Associated With Latent Profiles of Internet Addiction Among Male College Freshmen. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:642914. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.642914
  12. Rasanen T, Lintonen T, Tolvanen A, Konu A. The role of social support in the association between gambling, poor health and health risk-taking. Scand J Public Health. 2016; 44(6):593-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494816654380
روانشناسی ورزش
دوره 16، شماره 2
1403
صفحه 16-32

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار