اثرات غرور فیزیکی، شرم از بدن و نفوذ اجتماعی در نظارت بر بدن و مشارکت ورزشی زنان: رویکرد معادلات ساختاری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه اراک

2 پژوهشگاه علوم ورزشی

3 گروه تربیت بدنی دانشگاه کردستان

4 دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی مدیریت بازاریابی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر اثرات غرور فیزیکی، شرم از بدن و نفوذ اجتماعی در نظارت بربدن و مشارکت ورزشی زنان با رویکرد معادلات ساختاری بود.
روش‌ها: جامعة آماری پژوهش را زنان استان  تهران تشکیل دادند که براساس تخمین حجم نمونة بهینه 281 نمونة قابل ‌قبول گردآوری شد. پرسش‌نامة تصویر بدنی مک­کینلی و هاید (1996) برای بررسی و سنجش نظارت از بدن و شرم از بدن مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. از پرسش‌نامة خودبینی هانگ و همکاران  (2011) جهت ارزیابی غرور فیزیکی و نفوذ اجتماعی استفاده شد. در نهایت برای سنجش مشارکت ورزشی از پرسش‌نامه تعدیل‌شده مشارکت ورزشی استفاده‌ شد.
نتایج: ارزیابی مدل بیرونی ابزار پژوهش را تائید کرد. همچنین نتایج برازش مدل درونی نیز حاکی از تناسب مدل درونی داشت. نتایج  نشان داد شرم از بدن با 52/0، غرور فیزیکی با 25/0 و نفوذ اجتماعی با 15/0 به ترتیب بر نظارت و در نهایت نظارت بدن نیز 46/0 بر مشارکت ورزشی زنان اثرگذاری مثبتی و معناداری داشتند.
نتیجه‌گیری: به‌طورکلی توجه بیشتر به نظارت بر بدن در بین زنان، به سطح بالای مشارکت ورزشی می­انجامد.. پرداختن به ورزش می­تواند از عوامل تقویت ابعاد نظارت بر بدن همچون کاهش شرم از بدن، افزایش غرور فیزیکی و نفوذ اجتماعی در بین زنان باشد که خود نشان از سلامت اجتماعی و روانی زنان جامعه دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effects of Physical Pride, Body Shame and Social Influence, on Body Supervision and Sports Participation in Structural Equation Approaches

نویسندگان [English]

  • Esfandiar Khosravizadeh 1
  • Zohreh Rezaei 2
  • Hossein Mansouri 3
  • AliReza Zare 4
1 Associate Professor, Sports Sciences Faculty, Arak University, Arak, Iran.
2 in Sport Sciences Research Institute (SSRI)
3 Department of Physical Education, University of Kurdistan
4 PhD students in Marketing Management, Department of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Kurdistan University, Sanandaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

Purpose: The present study aimed to investigate the effects of physical pride, body shame, and social influence on women's body monitoring and sport participation with a structural equation approach.
Methods: The statistical population of the study consisted of women in Tehran province. Based on an optimal sample size of 281 acceptable samples were collected on social media. The McKinley and Hyde (199) questionnaire, the Hang et al. (2011) questionnaire, and the modified physical activity questionnaire were the measuring tools.
Results: External model evaluation confirmed the research instrument. The results of fitting the internal model also showed the fit of the internal model. The results of fitting the internal model also showed the fit of an internal model. Results showed that body shame (0.52), physical pride (0.25), and social influence (0.15), finally, bodybuilding had a positive and significant effect on sport participation of women (0.46).
Conclusion: Finally, more attention to body monitoring in women leads to a higher level of athletic participation. Engaging in sports can be a factor in the strengthening of monitoring bodies such as reducing the shame of the body, and increasing pride in the physical and social influence among women, which is a sign of social and mental health of women has it.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sports participation
  • body Supervision
  • body shame
  • Social influence

مراجع

  1. Shabani A, Abdolmaleki M. Forecasting the Perfectionism and Psychological Needs Regarding Exercise Addiction in Female Athlete Students. Sport psychology Studies.2019, 8(29): 61-74. In Persian
  2. Shams A, Shamsipour Dehkordi P. Psychometric Properties of Sport Imagery Questionnaire among Iranian National Team’s Athletes. Motor Behavior. 2017, 9 (28): 17-36. (In Persian).
  3. ShahAbadi Z, Taher M. Intergenerational study of Yazd girls and mother’s body management style, Journal of Sociology and Lifestyle Management, 2015, 1(4): 67-95. In Persian
  4. Arabnarm B, Ramezanzade H. The Relationship of Body Image Concern with Perceived Body and Exercise Intention in Different Stages of Exercise Behavior Changes. Journal of Sport Psychology Studies, 2019, 28; 113-32. In Persian
  5. Burgess G, Gorgan S. Effects of 6 weeks aerobic dance intervention on body image and physical self-perceptions in adolescent girls. Body Image, 2006, 3(1), 57-66.
  6. Cash TF, Smolak L. Body image: A handbook of science, practice, and prevention. Guilford Press.
  7. Norozi A, Maleki A, Parsamehr M, Ghasemi H. Investigating the effect of body image and body management on women's sports participation in Ilam province. Journal of Applied Sociology, 2018, 29(4), 99-122. In Persian
  8. Mehak A, Friedman A, Cassin SE. Self-objectification, weight bias internalization, and binge eating in young women: Testing a mediational model. Body Image, 2018, 24, 111-115.
  9. Goral M. Social attitudes of Turkish students towards participation in physical education and sport. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 2010, 38(9), 1243-1258.
  10. Moradi Hezari R, Mansouri H, Sadeghi Boroujerdi S. The Effect of Using Luxurious Foreign Sports Brands and Body Management, with Emphasis on Mediating Role of Vanity Physical and Social Influence among Athletes. Sport Management Studies, 2020, 11(58), 17-34. In Persian
  11. Dixit S, Lugman N. Body image, social anxiety and psychological distress among young adults. Journal of psychology and clinical psychiatry, 2018, 9(1), 149-152.
  12. Ghorbani M, Sokhangouiea Y. The effects of three methods of Pilates, yoga and active range of motion common on the upper limbs and body image in women with breast cancer after mastectomy code. Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review, 2014, 6(2), 189-201. In Persian
  13. Leng HK, Phua YP, Yang Y. Body Image, Physical Activity and Sport Involvement: A Study on Gender Differences. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 2019, 85(1), 40-49.
  14. Emami Ghafari M, Maleki A, Zahedi MJ. Imagination about the body and its social acceptance (an empirical study among female students of Payame Noor University of Tehran), Social studies and research in Iran, 2015, 4(4), 571-591. In Persian
  15. Nouri A, Mohseni Tabrizi A. A Sociological Explanation of the Impact of Social Factors on the Body Management among Men 18 to 45 in Tehran with Emphasis on Self - Presentation. Journal of Social Problems of Iran, 2017, 7(2), 29-53. In Persian
  16. Schori D, Hofmann K, Abel T. Patterns of sports participation, health risk behaviors, and socio-economic position in young Swiss men, European journal for sport and society, 2017, 14(4), 348–365.
  17. Abdolhoseyni A, Haghighatian M. Social Factors Affecting Body Management in Adolescent and Young Girls and Boys in the City of Isfahan, Social Welfare Quarterly, 17, 2018, 67, 271-233. In Persian
  18. Wolf EJ, Harrington KM, Clark SL, Miller MW. Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2013, 73(6), 913-934.
  19. Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 2019, 2-24.
  20. Hair JF, Hult GM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd Edition, Sage Publications.
  21. Henseler J, Hubona G, Ray PA. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2016, 116: 2-20.
  22. Hung P, Huiling Chen A, Peng N, Hackley C, Amy Tiwsakul R, Chou CL. Antecedents of luxury brand purchase intention. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 2011, 20(6), pp. 457-467.
  23. Legh-Jones H, Moore S. Network social capital, social participation, and physical inactivity in an urban adult population. Social Science & Medicine, 2012, 74(9), 1362-1367.
  24. Izgiç F, Akyüz G, Doğan O, Kuğu N. Social phobia among university students and its relation to self-esteem and body image. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 2004, 49(9), 630-634.
  25. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling. 1999, 6: 1–55.
  26. Zaid Abadi R, Rezaei F, Motasharei E. Psychometric properties and normalization of Persian Version of Ottawa Mental Skills Assessment Tools (OMSAT-3). Sport Psychology Studies. 2014,7: 63-82. (In Persian).
  27. Abbott BD, Barber BL. Embodied image: Gender differences in functional and aesthetic body image among Australian adolescents. Body Image, 2010, 7, 22- 31.
  28. Cash T. The impact of body image experiences: development of the body image quality of life inventory. International Journal of eating disorders. 2002, 131(4). 455-480.
  29. Marticotte F, Arcand M. Schadenfreude, attitude and the purchase intentions of a counterfeit luxury brand. Journal of Business Research, 2017, 77, 175-183.
  30. Qobadi H, Kaldi A, Mahdavi S. A Sociological Explanation of Body Management and its Relationship with. Social and Cultural Factors. 2019, 13(45), 75-95. In Persian
  31. Sahaf R, Delbari A, Fadaye Vatan R, Rassafiani M, Sabour M, Ansari G, Shams A. Validity and Reliability of Self-Report Physical Activity Instruments for Iranian Older People. Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2014, 9 (3): 206-217.
  32. Shemshadi H, Shams A, Sahaf R, Shamsipour Dehkordi P, Zareian H, Moslem AR. Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ) Among Iranian Elderly. Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2020, 15 (3) :298-311.

 

روانشناسی ورزش
دوره 14، شماره 2
1401
صفحه 148-131

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 04 مهر 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 04 آذر 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 06 دی 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار