تأثیر محیط تمرینی رقابتی و غیر رقابتی بر یادگیری مهارت پرتاب آزاد بسکتبال در دختران نوجوان با اضطراب صفتی بالا و پایین

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد رفتار حرکتی،دانشکده علوم ورزشی،دانشگاه اصفهان،اصفهان،ایران

2 دانشیار گروه رفتارحرکتی و مدیریت ورزشی،دانشکده علوم ورزشی،دانشگاه اصفهان،اصفهان،ایران

3 استاد گروه رفتار حرکتی و مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

چکیده

هدف: هدف از پژوهش بررسی تاثیر محیط‏های تمرینی رقابتی و غیررقابتی بر اکتساب و یادداری مهارت پرتاب آزاد بسکتبال در در دختران نوجوان با اضطراب صفتی بالا و پایین بود.

روش‏‏: در این پژوهش نیمه‏تجربی، 47 دختر نوجوان براساس نمرات اضطراب صفتی به دوگروه اضطراب صفتی بالا و پایین تقسیم و با توجه به نمرات پیش آزمون، به دو گروه‏ تمرینی در محیط رقابتی و غیررقابتی جای گرفتند. چهار گروه در محیط های تمرینی 8 جلسه به تمرین پرداختند. پیش‌آزمون، آزمون های اکتساب و آزمون یادداری از شرکت‌کنندگان اخذ شد. برای تحلیل داده ها از آزمون‏های واریانس یک‏راهه و تحلیل واریانس با اندازه‏های تکراری استفاده شد.

یافته‏ها: عملکرد گروه‌ها در مهارت پرتاب آزاد بسکتبال در مرحله اکتساب و یادداری فوری بدون تفاوت معنی‌‌دار است. گروه‌ها در مرحله یادداری تاخیری اختلاف معنی دار آماری با همدیگر دارند. نتایج نشان داد تمرین در محیط رقابتی منجر به عملکرد بهتر در شرکت کنندگان با اضطراب صفتی پایین و بالا شد. در اجرای مهارت ملاک، محیط رقابتی، ترجیحاً با اضطراب صفتی پایین و سپس با اضطراب صفتی بالا تعامل نشان داد.

نتیجه‌گیری: عملکرد شرکت‌کنندگان عمدتاً متاثر از محیط تمرین است نه سطح اضطراب صفتی طوری که شرکت کنندگان با اضطراب صفتی پایین و بالا در محیط تمرینی رقابتی عملکرد بهتری از خود نشان دادند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Competitive and Non-competitive Training Conditions on Learning of Basketball Free Throws in female adolescent with high and low-trait anxiety Short title: Interaction of Training Environment and trait anxiety in sport skill learning

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Velayatee 1
  • Mehdi Rafeii 2
  • Ahmadreza Movahedi 3
1 Master of Motor Behavior.university of isfahan
2 Associate Professor, Department of Motor Behavior.University of Isfahan.
3 Professor at the Department of Motor Behavior, University of Isfahan
چکیده [English]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of competitive and non-competitive exercise environments on the acquisition and retention of basketball free throws (BFT) in female adolescents with high and low trait anxiety.
Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, 47 adolescent girls were divided into two groups based on their trait anxiety scores: high and low. They were then placed into two training groups, one in a competitive environment and the other in a non-competitive environment, based on their pre-test scores. Participants in the experimental groups underwent BFT training for 8 sessions. Pre-test, acquisition, and retention tests were administered before the intervention, during the exercise sessions, and after the last acquisition session, respectively. Data analysis involved the use of one-way ANOVA and repeated measures analysis of variance.
Results: The results indicated that there was no significant difference in BFT performance between the groups during the acquisition and immediate retention phases. However, a significant difference was found between the groups in the delayed retention test. Specifically, training in a competitive environment led to better performance in participants with both high and low trait anxiety. The competitive environment had a stronger positive effect on participants with low trait anxiety, followed by those with high trait anxiety.
Conclusion: The training environment, rather than the level of trait anxiety, significantly influenced participants' performance in BFT. Both individuals with high and low trait anxiety performed better in a competitive training environment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • basketball free throw
  • acquisition
  • retention
  • competitive environment
  • trait anxiety

مراجع

  1. Goodway JD, Ozmun JC, Gallahue DL. Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2019.
  2. Schmidt RA, Lee TD, Winstein C, Wulf G, Zelaznik HN. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis: Human kinetics; 2018.
  3. Edwards WH. Motor learning and control: From theory to practice: Cengage Learning; 2010.
  4. Magill R, Anderson D. Motor learning and control: McGraw-Hill Publishing New York; 2010.
  5. Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach: Human kinetics; 2008.
  6. Englert C, Seiler R. Anxiety and volleyball performance in a real testing situation: Gender differences in competitive environments. Educational psychology. 2020;40(6):735-49.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.170672

  1. Radlo SJ. Effects of biofeedback and imagery on learning in a competitive environment. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 2007;29.
  2. Song H, Kim J, Tenzek KE, Lee KM. The effects of competition and competitiveness upon intrinsic motivation in exergames. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013;29(4):1702-8. 1016/j.chb.2013.01.042
  3. Mellalieu SD, Neil R, Hanton S, Fletcher D. Competition stress in sport performers: Stressors experienced in the competition environment. Journal of sports sciences. 2009;27(7):729-44. 1080/02640410902889834
  4. Triplett N. The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. The American journal of psychology. 1898;9(4):507-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1412188
  5. Gill DL, Williams L, Reifsteck EJ. Psychological dynamics of sport and exercise: Human Kinetics; 2017.
  6. Habibi A, Movahedi A, Nezakatalhoseini M, Moradi J. The Effect of Competitive and Non-competitive Training Condition on Learning of Basketball Free Throw Skill in Non-competitive Persons. Sports Psychology. 2009; 1(1):237-44. In Persian
  7. Weinberg RS, Gould D. Foundations of sport and exercise psychology: Human Kinetics; 2014.
  8. Khaksar Boldaji M, Rafeii Boroujeni M, Movahedi AR. the effect of pairing the personality characteristic of competitiveness, non-competitiveness and training environment in observational practice on learning of dart throwing. Motor Behavior. 2019;11 (35):103-16. In Persian 22089/mbj.2017.4539.1533

 

 

 

 

  1. Moradi J, Vaez Moosavi SMK, Amirtash AM. Interaction between individual, environment and task in motor learning: the effects of competitive atmosphere and mental toughness in learning two simple and complex sport skills. Motor Behavior. 2017;9(27):85-104. In Persian https://doi.org/10.22089/mbj.2017.2782.1342
  2. Spielberger CD. Theory and research on anxiety. Anxiety and behavior. 1966; 1: 1-15.
  3. Scanlan K, Lewtwaite R. Social psychological aspects of competition for male youth sport participants: IV. Predictors of enjoyment. Journal of sport psychology. 1986; 8: 25-35.
  4. Leal PC, Goes TC, da Silva LCF, Teixeira-Silva F. Trait vs. state anxiety in different threatening situations. Trends in psychiatry and psychotherapy. 2017;39:147-57.
  5. Tovilović S, Novović Z, Mihić L, Jovanović V. The role of trait anxiety in induction of state anxiety. Psihologija. 2009;42(4):491-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2016-0044
  6. Weinberg RS, Gould D. Fundamentos De Psicologia Del Deporte Y Del Ejercicio Fisico/Fundamentals of Sport Psychology and Physical Exercise: Ed. Médica Panamericana; 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/psi0904491t
  7. Spielberger CD. Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research: Elsevier; 2013.
  8. Wrisberg CA. Sport skill instruction for coaches: Human Kinetics; 2007.
  9. Eysenck MW, Calvo MG. Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & emotion. 1992; 6(6):409-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208409696
  10. Eysenck MW. Anxiety and cognitive-task performance. Personality and Individual differences. 1985; 6(5): 579-86.
  11. Wilson G, Nusbaum T, Whitney P, Hinson M. Trait anxiety impairs cognitive flexibility when overcoming a task acquired response and a preexisting bias. PLoS One. 2018; 13(9): e0204694. 1016/0191-8869(85)90007-8
  12. Eysenck MW, Derakshan N, Santos R, Calvo MG. Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion. 2007;7(2):336-53. 1037/1528-3542.7.2.336
  13. Horikawa M, Yagi The relationships among trait anxiety, state anxiety and the goal performance of penalty shoot-out by university soccer players. PloS one. 2012;7(4):e35727.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035727

  1. Calvo MG, Ramos PM. Effects of test anxiety on motor learning: The processing efficiency hypothesis. Anxiety Research. 1989;2: 45-55.
  2. Bokums RM, Meira Jr CM, Neiva JF, Oliveira T, Maia JF. Self-controlled feedback and trait anxiety in motor skill acquisition. Psychology. 2012;3(5):406-9. 4236/psych.2012.35057
  3. Rosenbaum DA. Human motor control: Academic press; 2009.
  4. Cameron CE, Cottone EA, Murrah WM, Grissmer DW. How are motor skills linked to children's school performance and academic achievement? Child Development Perspectives. 2016; 10:93-8. 1111/cdep.12168
  5. Spielberger C, Gorsuch R, Lushene R. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory test manual. Palo Alto. CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970. 53841/bpstest.2003.stai
  6. Panahi M. Preliminary review of validity, reliability, and softening of Spielberger's state-trait list. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University; 2001. In Persian
  7. GhasemZade F, Isazadeghan A, Mikaeli F. The role of prediction of state/trait anxiety based on behavioral brain systems and nightly bridges in students. J Health Promotion Management. 2019;8: 26-34. In Persian
  8. Movahedi A, Sheikh M, Bagherzadeh F, Hemayattalab R, Ashayeri H. A practice-specificity-based model of arousal for achieving peak performance. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2007; 39(6): 457-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/jmbr.39.6.457-462
  9. Habibi A, Movahedi A, Nezakat M, Jalali s, Moradi J. The Investigation of Competitiveness Trait Matching and the Kind of Training Condition in Learning a Sport Skill. Journal of Motor Learning and Movement. 2010; 22-34. In Persian
  10. Sage GH. Motor learning and control: A neuropsychological approach: Brown; 1984.
  11. Bird AM, Cripe BK. Psychology and sport behavior: Mosby Incorporated; 1986.
  12. Zeman J, Cassano M, Perry-Parrish C, Stegall S. Emotion regulation in children and adolescents. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 2006;27(2):155-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004703-200604000-00014
  13. Drews R, Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Children’s motor skill learning is influenced by their conceptions of ability. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2013;1(2):38-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jmld.1.2.38
  14. Barrell M, Terry C. Trait anxiety and coping strategies among ballet dancers. Medical Problems of Performing Artists. 2003;18: 59-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.21091/mppa.2003.2012
روانشناسی ورزش
دوره 15، شماره 2
1402
صفحه 83-94

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 12 بهمن 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 23 اردیبهشت 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 24 خرداد 1401

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار